Stimulus-response incompatibility effects on event-related potentials in children with attention-deficit

G Yong-Liang1, P Robaey, F Karayanidis

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychophysiologie Cognitive et de Neuropsychiatrie, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Canada.

Brain and Cognition
|June 17, 2000
PubMed

Insights

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children showed fewer correct responses but not a larger incompatibility effect. Their event-related potentials (ERPs) suggest strategic differences in information processing, not a specific deficit.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with deficits in executive functions and response control.
  • Previous research suggests potential response choice deficits in children with ADHD.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis of a response choice deficit in children with ADHD using a spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task.
  • To analyze event-related potentials (ERPs) to understand the neural underpinnings of performance differences.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded ERPs from 30 scalp electrodes in 21 ADHD and 21 typically developing boys during an SRC task.
  • Compared behavioral performance (accuracy, response speed) and ERP components (N1, N2, P3, P650, NSW) between groups.

Main Results:

  • ADHD children made fewer correct responses but did not exhibit a larger incompatibility effect on speed or accuracy.
  • ADHD children displayed longer N1 latency and a larger frontal N2 condition effect, indicating increased frontal involvement.
  • Task order influenced ERPs in ADHD children, with distinct effects on occipital P3, central P650, and parietal NSW compared to controls.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that children with ADHD exhibit strategic differences in information processing during the SRC task.
  • The results do not support a specific response choice deficit but rather point to broader attentional and cognitive control variations.