Related Experiment Videos
Impaired fasting glucose: how low should it go?
J E Shaw1, P Z Zimmet, A M Hodge
1International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. jshotham@hotmail.com
Diabetes Care
|June 17, 2000
Summary
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels show a continuous increase in cardiovascular risk and diabetes risk, without a clear threshold for impaired fasting glucose (IFG). A lower FPG limit may better define individuals at risk.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Disorders
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a recently defined stage of abnormal carbohydrate metabolism.
- The current glucose limits for IFG (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 6.1–6.9 mmol/l) lack strong supporting evidence.
- The existence of a clear threshold for IFG remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if 6.1 mmol/l represents a distinct cutoff for future diabetes risk.
- To determine if 6.1 mmol/l is a threshold for elevated cardiovascular risk factors.
- To explore the utility of lower FPG limits for defining IFG.
Main Methods:
- A population-based survey was conducted in Mauritius in 1987 with a 5-year follow-up.
- Oral glucose tolerance tests and cardiovascular risk factor measurements were performed at both time points.
- Data from 4,721 non-diabetic individuals at baseline and 3,542 at follow-up were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, obesity) increased linearly with FPG at baseline, showing no threshold effect.
- Individuals with baseline FPG ≥ 6.1 mmol/l had a significantly higher risk of developing hypertension at follow-up (P<0.001).
- The risk of developing diabetes increased with higher baseline FPG, with no clear threshold observed near 6.1 mmol/l.
Conclusions:
- Cardiovascular risk and future diabetes risk escalate continuously with increasing FPG, indicating no specific threshold for IFG definition.
- Defining IFG with a lower limit around 5.8 mmol/l would categorize individuals more similarly to those with impaired glucose tolerance regarding prevalence and diabetes risk.