Differential expression of two CYP1A genes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchys mykiss)

C M Råbergh1, N H Vrolijk, M M Lipsky

  • 1Department of Pathology, Program in Toxicology, University of Maryland at Baltimore, 10 South Pine Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. christina.rabergh@utu.fi

Insights

Rainbow trout exhibit differential gene expression in CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 in response to chemical inducers like beta-naphthoflavone and 3-methylcholanthrene. This study clarifies their distinct responses in vivo and in vitro, aiding toxicological research.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play a crucial role in xenobiotic metabolism.
  • Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) possess multiple CYP1A genes with potentially differential responses to environmental contaminants.
  • Previous nomenclature for trout CYP1A genes has been revised, with CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 being the current designations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential expression of two rainbow trout CYP1A genes (CYP1A3 and CYP1A1) in response to known CYP1A inducers.
  • To compare the in vivo and in vitro responses of these genes to various chemical treatments.
  • To clarify the nature of a previously described trout CYP1A cDNA sequence.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative analysis of CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 mRNA levels using RNase protection assay.
  • Treatment of rainbow trout with inducers beta-naphthoflavone (BNF) and 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC) in vivo.
  • Treatment of primary hepatocyte cultures with BNF, 3-MC, isosafrole (ISF), and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in vitro.
  • Sequence analysis and comparison of trout CYP1A genes and cDNA clones.

Main Results:

  • Significant, inducer-dependent induction of both CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 mRNA was observed in vivo.
  • BNF and 3-MC showed differential induction patterns for CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 mRNA in vivo.
  • In vitro, all tested inducers (BNF, 3-MC, ISF, TCDD) significantly induced both genes, but with less pronounced differential responses compared to in vivo.
  • Reanalysis revealed the Heilmann et al. cDNA is a hybrid of trout CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 genes.

Conclusions:

  • Rainbow trout CYP1A3 and CYP1A1 genes exhibit differential, inducer-dependent expression patterns.
  • The in vivo response to CYP1A inducers is more distinct between the two genes than the in vitro response.
  • The findings contribute to a better understanding of fish toxicology and gene regulation by xenobiotics.

Related Concept Videos

Epistasis02:31

Epistasis

In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
X-Inactivation01:58

X-Inactivation

The human X chromosome contains over ten times the number of genes as in the Y chromosome. Since males have only one X chromosome, and females have two, one might expect females to produce twice as many of the proteins, with undesirable results.
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon has three reading...
Dosage Compensation02:50

Dosage Compensation

In animals, gender is determined by the number and type of sex chromosome. For example, human females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y chromosome, whereas C.elegans with one X chromosome is a male, and the one with two X chromosomes is a hermaphrodite.
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with  distinct numbers of X chromosomes will have...