Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Prediction of permanent hearing loss in high-risk preterm infants at term age
A M Valkama1, K T Laitakari, E U Tolonen
1Department of Paediatrics, University of Oulu, Finland. marita.valkama@oulu.fi
Insights
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) screening is more effective than transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) or free field (FF) auditory responses for predicting permanent hearing loss in high-risk preterm infants. ABR demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity in identifying hearing defects.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Audiology
- Developmental pediatrics
Background:
- High-risk preterm infants require accurate hearing screening to detect permanent bilateral hearing loss.
- Early identification of hearing defects is crucial for timely intervention and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brainstem responses (ABR), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), and free field (FF) auditory responses in predicting permanent bilateral hearing loss in high-risk preterm infants.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of different hearing screening methods.
Main Methods:
- 51 preterm infants (gestational age < 34 weeks, birth weight < 1500 g) underwent hearing screenings (ABR, TEOAE, FF) at term post-conceptional age.
- Follow-up assessments of hearing, speech, and neurological development were conducted until 18 months corrected age.
- Significant hearing defects were confirmed with comprehensive ABR examinations and clinical observations.
Main Results:
- Bilateral failure in ABR screening predicted hearing loss with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.
- TEOAE screening showed 50% sensitivity and 84% specificity.
- FF examination had 50% sensitivity and 98% specificity.
- Six preterm infants were diagnosed with permanent bilateral hearing loss, four also had cerebral palsy.
Conclusions:
- Auditory brainstem response (ABR) screening is highly effective for identifying hearing loss in high-risk preterm infants.
- Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) may be less suitable due to potential retrocochlear damage.
- ABR is recommended as a more reliable screening method for this population.
Unlabelled:
The aim of this series was to assess hearing screenings; auditory brainstem responses (ABR), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and free field auditory responses (FF) for the prediction of permanent bilateral hearing loss in high-risk preterm infants at term post-conceptional age. A total of 51 preterm infants (gestational age < 34 weeks, birth weight < 1500 g) underwent examinations at term and hearing, speech and neurological development were followed up until a corrected age of 18 months. Significant hearing defects were verified by broader ABR examinations under sedation and by clinical ward observation including responsiveness to sounds and enhancement of hearing using an amplification device. Seven bilateral fails in ABR were found, together with nine bilateral fails in TEOAE and four fails in FF screening at term age. Six preterm infants were later confirmed to have a significant permanent bilateral hearing loss, four of whom had also cerebral palsy. Bilateral failure in ABR screening predicted hearing loss with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98%, TEOAE with a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 84% and in the FF examination at the levels of 50% and 98%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions alone seem not to be so applicable to the neonatal screening of hearing in high-risk preterm infants as shown earlier in full-term infants, possibly because a hearing defect may be due to retrocochlear damage. Consequently, auditory brainstem response screening seems to be more suitable for very low birth weight preterm infants.
More Related Videos
07:13Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
Published on: February 10, 2023
03:49Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation in High-Frequency Hearing Loss via Electric Acoustic Stimulation with Longer Electrode
Published on: October 11, 2024