Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the recipient.

L E Ratner1, R A Montgomery, W R Maley

  • 1Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-8611, USA.

Transplantation
|June 27, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical profiles of four patients with Rett syndrome carrying a novel exon 1 mutation or genomic rearrangement in the MECP2 gene.

Clinical genetics·2006
Same author

Eta' photoproduction on the proton for photon energies from 1.527 to 2.227 GeV.

Physical review letters·2006
Same author

Measurement of two- and three-nucleon short-range correlation probabilities in nuclei.

Physical review letters·2006
Same author

[Ulcerative gingivostomatitis and peridontitis].

HNO·2006
Same author

Search for Theta+ (1540) Pentaquark in High-Statistics Measurement of gammap-->K0K+n at CLAS.

Physical review letters·2006
Same author

[Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe sickle cell disease].

Revue medicale de Bruxelles·2006
Same journal

Filtered or Fried? Rethinking Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Liver Transplantation.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Simultaneous Liver-kidney Versus Liver Transplantation Categorized by Pretransplant eGFR: Impact of the 2017 OPTN Policy.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Preformed Anti-DQ Alpha Donor-specific Antibodies and the Risk of Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

People in Transplantation: Professor Nadey Hakim, MD, PhD, FRCS, FRCSGlas (Hon), FACS, President-Elect of The Transplantation Society.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

IL-1 Receptor Blockade Modulates Inflammation During Sequential Perfusion in Ex Vivo Porcine Kidneys.

Transplantation·2026
Same journal

Regulatory T Cells Allosensitized Under the Blockade of CD80/CD86-CD28 Costimulation Prolonged Islet Allograft Survival.

Transplantation·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is safe for kidney transplant recipients, showing similar survival and complication rates compared to open surgery. This minimally invasive approach offers benefits to donors without harming recipients.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Transplant Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy offers donor advantages like reduced pain and faster recovery.
  • Previous analyses have not detailed recipient outcomes following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on kidney transplant recipient outcomes.
  • To determine if laparoscopic procurement of donor kidneys has any adverse effects on recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of live donor renal transplantations from January 1995 to April 1998.
  • Comparison of outcomes between recipients of laparoscopically procured kidneys (Lap) and kidneys from standard open flank approach (Open).
  • Assessment of recipient and graft survival, vascular thrombosis, ureteral complications, acute rejection, and graft function.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • One-year recipient survival (100% vs. 97.0%) and graft survival (93.5% vs. 91.1%) were comparable between Lap and Open groups.
  • Similar incidences of vascular thrombosis, ureteral complications, and acute rejection were observed in both groups.
  • Early post-transplant serum creatinine decline and long-term allograft function showed no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy does not negatively affect kidney transplant recipient outcomes.
  • The benefits to donors and acceptable recipient outcomes support the continued adoption of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
  • This procedure is justified for increasing live kidney donation rates and improving donor experience.