Related Experiment Videos
Clinical training experience in district general hospitals
R MacFaul1, S Jones, U Werneke
1Paediatric Department, Pinderfields Hospital, Pinderfields and Pontefract NHS Trust, Wakefield WF14 DG, UK. mfrod@easynet.co.uk
Insights
UK hospital trainees in paediatrics and general practice gain sufficient experience with common conditions in smaller units. However, exposure to rare and serious diseases is limited, questioning ideal training population sizes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Paediatric Training
- General Practice Training
Background:
- Assessing clinical experience for UK paediatric and general practice trainees is crucial.
- Current Royal College recommendations suggest minimum annual acute contacts and ideal population coverage for training.
- Hospital size significantly impacts the breadth and depth of clinical exposure available.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical experience available to trainees in UK acute general hospitals of varying sizes.
- To analyze the implications for training and service configuration based on Royal College recommendations.
- To determine if current training population size recommendations are evidence-based.
Main Methods:
- Compared observed diagnosis frequencies in Pinderfields Hospital with other UK hospitals.
- Utilized national routine and epidemiological data for selected marker conditions.
- Modeled expected diagnosis frequencies for different hospital sizes based on Pinderfields data.
Main Results:
- Small units (≤1,800 acute referrals/year) adequately cover common conditions like gastroenteritis and asthma.
- Exposure to serious or unusual diseases remains infrequent even in units serving larger populations.
- Medium units offer broad experience, but optimal training population size recommendations lack strong evidence and may be impractical.
Conclusions:
- Current training recommendations for paediatric and general practice may not be fully supported by clinical workload data.
- Consolidating units to meet ideal population sizes presents practical challenges regarding access and equity.
- Training programs should consider the reality of clinical experience distribution across different hospital sizes.
Aims:
To estimate the nature and quantity of clinical experience available for trainees in paediatrics or general practice in acute general hospitals of differing sizes in the UK. To discuss implications for training and service configuration taking account of current Royal College recommendations (a minimum of 1,800 acute contacts each year and ideally covering a population of 450,000 to 500,000 people).
Methods:
Observed frequencies of diagnoses in Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield were compared with those in five other hospitals in Yorkshire and four in the South of England, and with expected frequencies from a review of selected marker conditions using national routine and epidemiological data. Based on the Pinderfields data, we modelled expected frequencies of a wider range of diagnoses for different sized hospitals.
Results:
Small units (1,800 or less acute referrals a year) provide adequate exposure to common conditions such as gastroenteritis (157 per annum) and asthma (171 per annum) but encounter serious or unusual disease rarely. When modelled for units serving larger populations, numbers of such disorders remain small. For example, about 0.5% of admissions require intensive care to the level of ventilatory support. Medium size units offer a wide range of experience but differ little from those serving the population of 500,000 proposed as being optimal for training. This standard is not justified by the evidence in this review. Closing or amalgamating units on the scale necessary to achieve this ideal would be impractical as only five hospitals in England have a paediatric workload equivalent to this population; it would also raise issues of access and equity.