Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Semantic representation and ease of predication.

P de Mornay Davies1, E Funnell

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. paul32@mdx.ac.uk

Brain and Language
|June 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accidental discharge of brodifacoum baits into a freshwater lake: a case study.

Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·2011
Same author

Exploratory review of placebo characteristics reported in randomised placebo controlled antidepressant drug trials.

Pharmacopsychiatry·2011
Same author

Lost for words or loss of memories? Autobiographical memory in semantic dementia.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2010
Same author

Evidence for scripts in semantic dementia: Implications for theories of semantic memory.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2010
Same author

Development of a screening instrument for language in older people (Barnes Language Assessment).

Aging & mental health·2002
Same author

A screening instrument for language in older people (Barnes Language Assessment).

International journal of language & communication disorders·2001
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Concrete words may not have richer semantic representations than abstract words, challenging existing theories. This finding suggests word frequency and concreteness, not just predicate numbers, influence semantic processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The Ease of Predication hypothesis suggests concrete words have more semantic predicates than abstract words.
  • This hypothesis proposes that differences in semantic representation explain concrete word advantages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Jones' (1985) Ease of Predication hypothesis.
  • To explore the relationship between word concreteness, frequency, and semantic representation.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis.
  • Analysis focused on predicate distributions and imageability of concrete and abstract words.

Main Results:

  • Concrete words showed a predicate advantage only for low-frequency words.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The Ease of Predication variable did not accurately reflect predicate distributions or imageability.
  • The variable appeared to represent differences in concreteness rather than predicate richness.

    • Conclusions:

    • The Ease of Predication hypothesis may not be a valid basis for theories of semantic representation.
    • Models assuming richer semantic representations for concrete words are not supported by these findings.