Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials.

H E Placko1, S Mishra, J J Weimer

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA. placko@atax.eng.uab.edu

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|June 30, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Light Pseudoscalar Bosons, Pair-Produced in Higgs Boson Decays in the Four-Electron Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence for Mixing-Induced CP Violation in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψϕ(1020) Decays in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of Suppressed Charged-Particle Production in Ultrarelativistic Oxygen-Oxygen Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of D^{0} Meson Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of tWZ Production at the CMS Experiment.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Exclusive Reconstruction of the B^{*+}, B^{*0}, and B_{s}^{*0} Mesons and Precise Measurement of Their Masses.

Physical review letters·2026

Surface treatments affect titanium and titanium alloy properties. Electropolished and grit-blasted surfaces showed similar large-scale roughness, while electropolished and polished surfaces had similar small-scale roughness, with primarily titanium dioxide detected.

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Surface Engineering
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) and titanium-6% aluminum-4% vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy are widely used in biomedical applications.
  • Surface properties significantly influence the performance and biocompatibility of titanium implants.
  • Understanding the impact of surface treatments on titanium's morphology and chemistry is crucial for optimizing its use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of polished, electropolished, and grit-blasted surface treatments on CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V.
  • To characterize the surface morphology and chemical composition resulting from different treatments.
  • To compare the surface roughness and oxide layer characteristics across various treatment methods.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Surface morphology and chemistry were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Auger microprobe analysis (AMA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
  • Quantitative roughness measurements were performed at both large and small scales.
  • Surface elemental composition and oxide states were determined.
  • Main Results:

    • Surface roughness was comparable between grit-blasted and electropolished samples at large scales, and between electropolished and polished samples at small scales.
    • The primary surface oxide on both titanium materials, regardless of treatment, was titanium dioxide (TiO2).
    • Vanadium was not detected on the Ti-6Al-4V alloy surface using XPS and AMA, suggesting potential surface depletion. Calcium was found on grit-blasted surfaces, and calcium and chlorine were detected on electropolished surfaces.

    Conclusions:

    • Surface treatments significantly alter the topography and chemistry of titanium and its alloys.
    • Electropolishing and grit-blasting offer comparable large-scale roughness, while electropolishing and conventional polishing yield similar small-scale roughness.
    • The presence of contaminants like calcium and chlorine on specific treated surfaces warrants further investigation for biomedical implications.