Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical and methodological considerations for vision screening.

D C Allen

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |October 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Precipitation and temperature drive continental-scale patterns in stream invertebrate production.

    Science advances·2019
    Same author

    Meta-analysis: abundance, behavior, and hydraulic energy shape biotic effects on sediment transport in streams.

    Ecology·2015
    Same author

    Within-tree distributions of the Sirex noctilio Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Siricidae)--parasitoid complex and development of an optimal sampling scheme.

    Environmental entomology·2012
    Same author

    Condensation of rye chromatin in somatic interphase nuclei of Ph1 and ph1b wheat.

    Cytogenetic and genome research·2008
    Same author

    Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with methotrexate.

    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2006
    Same author

    Predicting response to treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2005
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    This study clarifies essential statistical measures for screening programs, including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Understanding these metrics is crucial for accurately evaluating screening test performance and patient outcomes.

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Public Health
    • Epidemiology

    Background:

    • Screening programs are vital for early disease detection.
    • Accurate statistical measures are essential for evaluating screening program effectiveness.
    • Current definitions and applications of these measures require clear elucidation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define and illustrate key statistical measures used in screening programs.
    • To explain the relationship between these measures, disease prevalence, and expected outcomes.
    • To provide a method for calculating the standard error of sensitivity and specificity.

    Main Methods:

    • Definitions and illustrations of sensitivity, specificity, false positive, and false negative rates.
    • Discussion of positive and negative predictive values and referral rates.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstration of the relationship between rates, prevalence, and screening results.

    • Main Results:

    • Clear definitions and practical examples of statistical measures for screening.
    • Illustration of how prevalence impacts predictive values and referral rates.
    • A method for calculating the standard error of sensitivity and specificity is presented.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized understanding of statistical measures enhances screening program evaluation.
    • Accurate interpretation of these metrics is critical for clinical decision-making.
    • The provided methods facilitate robust statistical analysis in screening research.