Multiple adverse events with a dual chamber pacemaker

The aim of the study was to evaluate our experience with Physiocor 400T, a dual chamber unipolar pacemaker manufactured by Sorin Biomedica. Between March 1993 and December 1994, 63 units of that model were implanted at our center. Patients were followed for 46 +/- 16 months. By the end of follow-up, 15 patients had died, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and two units had been replaced for unrelated reasons. During follow-up the following phenomena had been observed: (1) Spontaneous backup reversion (VOO, 80 ppm) in 6 (9.5%) of 63 patients. In three patients this phenomenon was accompanied by concomitant ineffective pacing artifacts at 130 beats/min with very low pulse widths. (2) Unexpected battery depletion (EOL) occurred in 3 (5%) of 63 patients; two of the three occurred within weeks of routine evaluation that confirmed normal battery status. (3) Early elective replacement time (ERT) unpreceded by a gradual drop in magnet rate in 2 (3.2%) of 63 patients. (4) Total loss of telemetry without change in pacing mode in 1 (1.6%) of 63 patients. The estimated event-free 5-year survival of this model was 46%. In conclusion, 12 (19%) of 63 patients had adverse events with Physiocor 400T pacemakers. The potential risk of asynchronous pacing for prolonged periods and the risk of unexpected EOL warrants consideration of elective replacement of all remaining units.