Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach.

I Michelet1, F Agresta

  • 1Department of Surgery, Ospedale Civile, Vittorio Veneto (TV), Italy.

The European Journal of Surgery = Acta Chirurgica
|July 6, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2020
Same author

Revue des maladies respiratoires actualites·2020
Same author

Could fluorescence-guided surgery be an efficient and sustainable option? A SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery) health technology assessment summary.

Surgical endoscopy·2020
Same author

Supportive oncofertility care, psychological health and reproductive concerns: a qualitative study.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2019
Same author

Improved immediate postoperative pain following laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using self-adhering mesh: the importance of clinical practice guidelines.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2018
Same author

Survey of Reproductive Experiences and Outcomes of Cancer Survivors Who Stored Reproductive Material Before Treatment.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2017
Same journal

Giant mediastinal parathyroid adenoma presenting with a hyperparathyroid crisis and leading to postoperative hungry bone syndrome.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2004
Same journal

Castleman disease in differential diagnosis of a pancreatic mass.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2004
Same journal

Pedunculated lipoma of the oesophagus in a patient with achalasia.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2004
Same journal

Recording of postoperative complications: quantity and quality.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2004
Same journal

Trauma management and education in europe: a survey of twelve geographically and socioeconomically diverse European countries.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2004
Same journal

Regional differences in the use of a vascular surgical service and incidence of amputations in a well-defined geographical area.

The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2004
See all related articles

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers is a safe and suitable option for select patients. This minimally invasive approach offers comparable outcomes to open surgery, reducing the need for laparotomy.

Area of Science:

  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Perforated peptic ulcer disease necessitates prompt surgical intervention.
  • Traditional open surgery carries significant morbidity.
  • Laparoscopic techniques offer potential advantages in surgical recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers.
  • To compare laparoscopic versus open surgical approaches for this condition.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 30 patients with perforated peptic ulcers treated between 1992 and 1997.
  • Comparison of outcomes between 16 patients undergoing laparoscopic repair and 14 undergoing open surgery.
  • Assessment of morbidity and mortality as primary outcome measures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic repair was successful in 15 out of 16 patients, with one conversion to open surgery due to inadequate visualization.
  • No significant differences were observed in operation duration, postoperative nasogastric aspiration, analgesic requirements, hospital stay, morbidity, or mortality between the two groups.
  • Laparoscopic surgery demonstrated comparable safety and effectiveness to open surgery.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic repair is a safe and viable treatment for selected patients with perforated peptic ulcers.
  • This approach can be beneficial in cases where avoiding a laparotomy is desirable.
  • Further research may explore patient selection criteria for optimal laparoscopic outcomes.