Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling DNA mutation and recombination for directed evolution experiments.

G L Moore1, C D Maranas

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|July 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insecticide residues in pronghorn antelope of South Dakota.

Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·2013
Same author

OptCDR: a general computational method for the design of antibody complementarity determining regions for targeted epitope binding.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2010
Same author

Quantitative assessment of uncertainty in the optimization of metabolic pathways.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2008
Same author

A mixed integer linear programming (MILP) framework for inferring time delay in gene regulatory networks.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2004
Same author

Review of the TEIRESIAS-based tools of the IBM Bioinformatics and Pattern Discovery Group.

Metabolic engineering·2001
Same author

Minimal reaction sets for Escherichia coli metabolism under different growth requirements and uptake environments.

Biotechnology progress·2001
Same journal

Evolution of quantitative traits: exploring the ecological, social and genetic bases of adaptive polymorphism.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

The male-biased sex ratio in humans and its role in the transition from promiscuity to pair bonding.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the counter-intuitive effects of vaccination by coupling the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 and the evolution of human behaviors.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A hybrid reaction-diffusion and mechanical stimulus model for mandibular bone remodeling under chewing and vibratory loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces predictive models to optimize directed evolution experiments. These models quantify outcomes for error-prone PCR and DNA shuffling, improving the efficiency of discovering novel proteins with enhanced functions.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Protein Engineering

Background:

  • Directed evolution generates novel proteins via cycles of mutagenesis, screening, and amplification.
  • Current methods are labor-intensive, expensive, and have uncertain outcomes.
  • Improving efficiency in protein engineering is crucial for diverse applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce predictive models for quantifying directed evolution experiment outcomes.
  • To aid in setting up experiments for maximizing the discovery of improved enzymes.
  • To enhance the efficiency and predictability of protein engineering.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling error-prone PCR to calculate nucleotide sequence probabilities after multiple cycles.
  • Modeling DNA shuffling, including random fragmentation, fragment assembly, and mutation combination probabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing model predictions with experimental data for validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Developed predictive models for error-prone PCR and DNA shuffling.
    • Models accurately quantify the probability of specific sequence and mutation outcomes.
    • Model predictions showed favorable comparison with experimental results.

    Conclusions:

    • Predictive models can significantly improve the setup and efficiency of directed evolution.
    • These models offer a quantitative approach to protein engineering.
    • The developed models aid in maximizing the chances of identifying DNA sequences encoding enzymes with improved activities.