Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Influenza A Virus Studies in a Mouse Model of Infection
Published on: September 7, 2017
The Pertussis Serological Potency Test. Collaborative study to evaluatereplacement of the Mouse Protection Test
A van der Ark1, I van Straaten-van de Kappelle, R M Olander
1National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT)--based on in vitro assessment of the humoral immune response against Bordetella pertussis--was developed as an alternative for the Mouse Protection Test (MPT). A small-scale collaborative study was carried out in five laboratories to evaluate the relevance and reliability of the PSPT. The study has been divided into three separate phases, each with its own objective. A pilot-phase study of the antibody detection assay, the 18323-whole cell ELISA (WCE), was included for training purposes. Significant differences in absorbance and antibody concentrations between the laboratories were found. In the Phase I study, the intra-assay, inter-assay and inter-laboratory precisions of the 18323-WCE were assessed. Although a precision of less than 20% was not always established and significant differences in antibody concentrations were found at random throughout the Phase I study, the ranking of the antibody concentrations corresponded well between the laboratories and should warrant a reliable potency estimation of whole cell vaccines (WCV's) in the PSPT. Phase II was a comparative study of the PSPT and the MPT to evaluate the implementation of the PSPT, to demonstrate correlation and to compare the reproducibility and reliability of both tests. The mean antibody concentrations per vaccine dose in the PSPT and the survival of mice in the MPT differed significantly within and between the laboratories. Nevertheless, the potencies of the vaccines under test estimated in both test models did not differ significantly (P>0.05). The PSPT and MPT correlated well in chi2-test of homogeneity within and between the laboratories. The potencies were similar (overall ratio=0.877), but the PSPT is more reproducible and reduces the chance of re-testing due to the smaller 95% confidence intervals. We have demonstrated that the PSPT is a valid model to estimate the potencies of pertussis WCV's from different manufacturers. Moreover, the 18323-WCE is easy to carry out and the intra-assay precision and antibody ranking warrants a reliable potency testing of pertussis WCV's in the PSPT.
Insights
The Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT) offers a reliable in vitro alternative to the Mouse Protection Test (MPT) for assessing pertussis vaccines. This study confirms PSPT
Area of Science:
- * Immunology
- * Vaccinology
- * Microbiology
Background:
- * The Mouse Protection Test (MPT) is the standard for pertussis vaccine potency testing.
- * An in vitro alternative, the Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT), was developed.
- * PSPT assesses the humoral immune response against Bordetella pertussis.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To evaluate the relevance and reliability of the PSPT in a collaborative study.
- * To compare PSPT with the established MPT.
- * To assess the performance of the 18323-whole cell ELISA (WCE) assay.
Main Methods:
- * A collaborative study involving five laboratories.
- * Three phases: pilot study of 18323-WCE, Phase I for precision, Phase II for comparative analysis.
- * Assessed intra-assay, inter-assay, and inter-laboratory precision of 18323-WCE.
Main Results:
- * Significant differences in absorbance and antibody concentrations were observed between laboratories.
- * Despite variations, antibody ranking in the 18323-WCE assay showed good inter-laboratory correlation.
- * Vaccine potencies estimated by PSPT and MPT did not differ significantly; PSPT demonstrated higher reproducibility.
Conclusions:
- * The Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT) is a valid and reliable in vitro method for estimating pertussis whole cell vaccine (WCV) potencies.
- * The 18323-WCE assay is easy to perform and provides reliable potency testing.
- * PSPT offers improved reproducibility and reduced re-testing compared to MPT.

