Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prostatic manipulation has a minimal effect on complexed prostate-specific antigen levels.

N N Lynn1, G N Collins, P H O'Reilly

  • 1Department of Urology, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK.

BJU International
|July 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Penile tuberculosis after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation.

BJU international·2009
Same author

Early and late morbidity after vasectomy: a comparison of chronic scrotal pain at 1 and 10 years.

BJU international·2004
Same author

Brachytherapy: the surgeon's perspective.

BJU international·2003
Same author

Management of acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in the UK: a national survey.

BJU international·2003
Same author

Unusual aspects of idiopathic hydronephrosis.

BJU international·2003
Same author

Ureteric obstruction caused by aneurysm of the hypogastric artery.

Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2003
Same journal

Impact of prostate mpMRI quality on diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer: a prospective study.

BJU international·2026
Same journal

Automated irrigation systems in mitigating laser-induced temperature during simulated ureteroscopy.

BJU international·2026
Same journal

Cancer detection in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

BJU international·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of maintenance BCG versus gemcitabine/docetaxel following BCG induction in NMIBC.

BJU international·2026
Same journal

A call for regimen agnostic circulating tumour DNA-guided adjuvant selection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BJU international·2026
Same journal

Ablative radiotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BJU international·2026
See all related articles

Prostatic manipulation minimally affects complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) levels. While prostate biopsy showed a slight increase in cPSA, particularly in benign cases, other procedures had no significant impact.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Andrology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Prostatic manipulation methods are known to elevate serum total and free PSA levels.
  • The impact of these manipulations on complexed PSA (cPSA) remains less understood.
  • Understanding cPSA behavior is crucial for accurate prostate cancer diagnosis and monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of common prostatic manipulations on serum cPSA levels.
  • To compare the changes in cPSA with those of total PSA following these procedures.
  • To determine if prostatic manipulation influences cPSA measurements in a clinically significant manner.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 92 men underwent prostatic manipulation (biopsy, digital rectal exam, or flexible cystoscopy).
  • Blood samples were collected pre-manipulation and 30 minutes post-manipulation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Serum total PSA and cPSA levels were quantified using specific assays.

    • Main Results:

    • Flexible cystoscopy and digital rectal examination did not significantly alter cPSA levels.
    • Prostate biopsy resulted in a statistically significant but minimal increase in cPSA (mean 2.13 ng/mL) in patients with benign histology (P < 0.01).
    • No significant cPSA rise was observed post-biopsy in prostate cancer patients (P = 0.35), contrasting with a marked total PSA increase (mean 19.79 ng/mL, P < 0.01).

    Conclusions:

    • Prostatic manipulation generally has minimal impact on serum cPSA levels.
    • Prostate biopsy demonstrates a slight, clinically insignificant rise in cPSA, primarily in benign conditions.
    • cPSA appears more stable than total PSA in response to prostatic manipulation, suggesting potential utility in specific diagnostic scenarios.