Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection.

L Sánchez Rodríguez1

  • 1Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden. leo.sanchez@bbsrc.ac.uk

Heredity
|July 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acquired Facial Dermal Melanocytosis of the Sun's Nevus Type: A Case Report.

Actas dermo-sifiliograficas·2019
Same journal

Non-coding DNA dynamics and its roles as a physical barrier in genome safeguarding across early development and evolution.

Heredity·2026
Same journal

Landscape genetics of the copal tree, Bursera cuneata (Burseraceae): the key role of the tropical dry forest in shaping connectivity at the regional scale.

Heredity·2026
Same journal

From Paleogene to Anthropocene: phylogeography, geographic patterns of traits, and chronology of evolutionary drivers in northeast Asian anurans.

Heredity·2026
Same journal

It is hard to be small: Inbreeding depression on male breeding success depends on body size in a threatened songbird.

Heredity·2026
Same journal

How precise are mutation rate estimates? Comparison of different approaches to estimate de novo mutation rates.

Heredity·2026
Same journal

Insights from farming Macrocystis pyrifera offshore: phenotypic analysis, genome-wide association studies, genomic selection.

Heredity·2026
See all related articles

Balanced selection aims to preserve gene diversity for sustained genetic gain. However, this study found that slight unbalances in selection can improve the balance between genetic gain and diversity loss, especially under certain conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative genetics
  • Animal breeding
  • Population genetics

Background:

  • Balanced selection aims to maintain genetic diversity and achieve steady selection response over generations.
  • Unrestricted selection can lead to rapid gains but may deplete genetic diversity.
  • Understanding the trade-offs between selection response and genetic diversity is crucial for long-term breeding programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare balanced selection with slightly unbalanced and unrestricted selection strategies.
  • To evaluate the impact of selection methods on genetic gain and diversity loss over 30 generations.
  • To investigate the influence of heritability, population size, and family size on selection efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted over 30 generations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Selection strategies included balanced, slightly unbalanced, and unrestricted selection.
  • Key metrics analyzed were retrieved genetic response and genetic diversity consumed (group coancestry).
  • Heritability, population size, and family size were varied as simulation parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • Slightly unbalanced selection showed a favorable relationship between response and diversity loss compared to balanced selection, particularly at low/moderate heritabilities and with small population/family sizes.
    • Both balanced and slightly unbalanced selection, by constraining the number of contributing families, reduced gene loss compared to unrestricted selection.
    • The efficiency of gain per unit of genetic diversity consumed decreased with increasing levels of unbalance.

    Conclusions:

    • Slightly unbalanced selection can be more efficient than complete balanced selection in terms of selection efficiency.
    • Constraining the number of contributing families is effective in mitigating gene loss.
    • The optimal selection strategy depends on genetic parameters and population structure.