Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

[The wandering gastrostomy tube].

¹kylle@dadlnet.dk

Ugeskrift for Laeger

|July 15, 2000

Summary

A misplaced percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube caused severe diarrhea and cachexia in a patient. This case highlights the critical importance of verifying PEG tube placement to prevent serious gastrointestinal complications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Three-dimensional analysis of mineralizing turkey leg tendon: matrix vesicle-collagen relationships.

Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology·1995

Same author

Image analysis of the extracellular matrix.

Microscopy research and technique·1994

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Gastroenterology
Medical Device Complications
Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are commonly used for enteral feeding.
Complications associated with PEG tube placement can significantly impact patient outcomes.
Chronic diarrhea and cachexia are debilitating symptoms requiring thorough investigation.

Observation:

A patient presented with severe, chronic diarrhea and cachexia following PEG tube insertion.
The patient experienced persistent gastrointestinal distress since the PEG tube placement two months prior.
Contrast X-ray imaging revealed the distal end of the PEG tube malpositioned within the colon.

Findings:

Malposition of the PEG tube in the colon was identified as the cause of the patient's symptoms.
The incorrect placement led to continuous gastrointestinal irritation and nutrient malabsorption.
Diagnostic imaging proved crucial in identifying the device-related complication.

Implications:

This case underscores the necessity of routine post-procedure verification of PEG tube placement.
Failure to confirm correct placement can lead to severe, preventable patient morbidity.
Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for device-related issues when patients develop unexpected GI symptoms after PEG insertion.

Related Experiment Videos