Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Preparation of a Blood Culture Pellet for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Published on: October 15, 2014
Cost consequences of elimination of the routine group B streptococcus culture at a teaching hospital
C S Russell1, D Griffin, R F Hume
1Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington 98498, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate the cost consequence of the elimination of routine Group B streptococcus (GBS) cultures in pregnancy utilizing risk factor assessment management recommendations of the Center for Disease Control.
Methods:
This retrospective study cohort population included all delivering patients from June 1, 1996, to May 31, 1997, managed by the Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) guidelines May 31, 1996, for GBS in pregnancy compared to the previous 29 months cohort from January 1, 1994, to May 31, 1996, managed with routine GBS cultures done at 35-37 weeks.
Results:
Of the 7,681 culture management control cohort patients, there were four neonates with culture-positive GBS sepsis (1/1,900). The cost for detection of a single positive culture in an affected neonate was $8,627 ($34,509/4) and there were 2,875 personnel hours expended. In contrast, of the 2,011 patients in the risk factor management cohort, there were two cases of neonatal GBS sepsis ($111,005). The cost for detection of a positive culture in an affected neonate was $1,579 ($3,159/2) and there were 263 personnel hours expended in the risk factor management group. In spite of these significant laboratory savings, we noted a concurrent increase in the total cost in the newborn nursery for septic work-ups and treatment from $2.4 million to $3.1 million.
Conclusion:
Risk assessment management of GBS provided a savings of both money ($7,048/positive neonatal culture) and laboratory time (586 personnel hours/positive neonatal culture). However, these savings were more than offset by cost increases occurring in the newborn nursery ($400,000), demonstrating the necessity of practice patterns to undergo concurrent evaluation to verify cost savings and prevent shifting of expenses.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies. Common...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

