Effects of optokinetically induced rotatory self-motion on spatial perception and representation

Our aim was to investigate the influence of optokinetically induced rotatory self-motion sensation (circular vection [CV]) on asymmetries in real and representational space in normal subjects.

Vestibular and optokinetic stimulation (particularly when accompanied by rightward CV) can reduce left-sided hemineglect in patients.

Twenty healthy right-handed men were administered a line bisection (LB) task and a stimulus-response compatibility task monitoring mental representation of space (the RULER task). The RULER task required speeded unimanual decisions ("smaller than 6?" vs. "larger than 6?") to foveally presented numbers between 1 and 11. Both tasks were performed in a baseline condition (no stimulation) and with full-field optokinetic stimulation to induce CV to either side.

The bisection marks of both hands were shifted significantly to the left during leftward CV, introducing a pseudoneglect for the left and right hands. Rightward CV did not influence LB. In the RULER task, we found a stimulus-response compatibility, namely, faster right-hand responses to large numbers (i.e., 7-11) and faster left-hand responses to small numbers (i.e., 1-5). Although optokinetic stimulation did not significantly affect subjects' representation of space, the overall pattern of observed deviations was strikingly similar to that obtained in LB.

Optokinetic stimulation affects healthy subjects' exploration and, to a lesser extent, their representation of space. In contrast to previous studies in neglect patients and healthy subjects, we found that leftward CV rather than rightward CV induced a leftward deviation of the subjective midpoint. This discrepancy is most likely a consequence of the exclusively peripheral visual field stimulation in our experiment. We suggest that the leftward deviation during rightward CV described in former studies may be due to the cuing effect of the leftward moving dots in the central visual field. In the absence of these central cues, the direction of CV seems to be the main determining factor for observed hemispatial effects.