Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rutgers University case study: a guide to non-routine high dose rate procedures for biomedical facilities.

P J McDermott1

  • 1Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety, The State University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8036, USA. mcdermot@rehs.rutgers.edu

Health Physics
|July 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ECE-1 influences prostate cancer cell invasion via ET-1-mediated FAK phosphorylation and ET-1-independent mechanisms.

Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology·2010
Same author

Overexpression of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger alters contractility and SR Ca2+ content in adult rat myocytes.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2001
Same author

Modifications of eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) in adult cardiocytes by adenoviral gene transfer: differential effects on eIF4F activity and total protein synthesis rates.

The Biochemical journal·2001
Same author

Transcriptional regulation of the rat eIF4E gene in cardiac muscle cells: the role of specific elements in the promoter region.

Gene·2001
Same author

Differential effects of pressure or volume overload on myocardial MMP levels and inhibitory control.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2000
Same author

Translational mechanisms accelerate the rate of protein synthesis during canine pressure-overload hypertrophy.

The American journal of physiology·1999

Biomedical facilities can safely handle high-dose-rate procedures like extracting a Cobalt-60 (60Co) source internally. This study details the successful internal relocation of a 60Co source, offering a viable alternative to external contracting.

Area of Science:

  • Radiological Health and Safety
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Non-routine, high dose rate procedures are infrequent but critical events in biomedical settings.
  • Many institutions outsource these complex operations due to limited in-house expertise.
  • This highlights a gap in institutional capacity for managing high-risk radiological tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To document and share a university's experience in performing a non-routine high-risk radiological procedure internally.
  • To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of in-house management of Cobalt-60 (60Co) source extraction and relocation.
  • To provide a case study for other biomedical facilities considering internal execution of similar procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed planning and risk assessment for the extraction of a 60Co source.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development and implementation of specialized shielding and handling protocols.
  • Safe transfer of the 60Co source from an underground storage to an above-ground shielded cask.
  • Radiation monitoring and safety checks throughout the procedure.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful extraction and relocation of the 60Co irradiation source was achieved without incident.
    • The internal team demonstrated effective management of the high-risk procedure.
    • Radiation exposure levels were maintained within safe operational limits.

    Conclusions:

    • Biomedical facilities possess the capability to conduct non-routine, high-dose-rate procedures, such as 60Co source management, internally.
    • In-house execution offers a cost-effective and controlled alternative to external contracting.
    • Sharing operational experiences is crucial for building institutional competence in radiological safety.