Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grading the evidence for diabetes performance measures.

S H Roman1, S B Silberzweig, A L Siu

  • 1Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. sroman@bethisraelny.org

Effective Clinical Practice : ECP
|August 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of an interdisciplinary diabetes specialist team on short-term outcomes of diabetes at a community health center.

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists·2004
Same author

Lipid lowering does not improve endothelial function in subjects with poorly controlled diabetes.

Diabetes care·2001
Same author

Windows of opportunity to improve diabetes care when patients with diabetes are hospitalized for other conditions.

Diabetes care·2001
Same author

The development and piloting of a capacity assessment tool.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2001
Same author

Mortality and locomotion 6 months after hospitalization for hip fracture: risk factors and risk-adjusted hospital outcomes.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Why do delays in treatment occur? Lessons learned from ruptured appendicitis.

Health services research·2001
Same journal

Using the Veterans Health Administration inpatient care database: trends in the use of antireflux surgery.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same journal

Veterans Health Administration inpatient and outpatient care data: an overview.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same journal

Using the National Health Interview Survey: time trends in influenza vaccinations among targeted adults.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same journal

The National Health Interview Survey: an overview.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same journal

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: an overview.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same journal

The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
See all related articles

Traditional evidence grading systems can misrepresent the quality of research for diabetes care. A new descriptive system using study design and modifiers offers more accurate grading of evidence for clinical practices.

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Diabetes care research

Background:

  • Grading scientific evidence is crucial for developing practice guidelines and quality measures.
  • Traditional hierarchical grading systems (e.g., Grades I-III) are commonly used to rank study designs.
  • These systems face challenges in accurately categorizing evidence for diabetes care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of traditional grading systems in diabetes care.
  • To propose a more descriptive and accurate method for grading evidence.
  • To improve the characterization of evidence supporting clinical practices in diabetes management.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a typologic grading system based on study design and explanatory modifiers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Included study designs such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT components, and observational studies.
  • Incorporated expert opinion as a category within the grading system.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed system allows for a more nuanced classification of evidence.
    • It helps to avoid evidence inflation or deflation often seen with traditional methods.
    • Accurate grading of evidence supports better clinical decision-making in diabetes care.

    Conclusions:

    • Traditional hierarchical grading systems are insufficient for the complexity of diabetes care evidence.
    • A descriptive typologic system provides a more accurate assessment of evidence quality.
    • This improved grading enhances the reliability of clinical practice guidelines for diabetes.