Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Warning research: an integrative perspective.

W A Rogers1, N Lamson, G K Rousseau

  • 1School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30332-0170, USA. wr43@prism.gatech.edu

Human Factors
|August 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Understanding warning effectiveness requires examining individual and warning characteristics. This research synthesizes evidence to improve warning design and compliance for better public safety outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Donation after cardiac death: community views about 'decent' intervals.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2011
Same author

Carbon tetrachloride poisoning with report of a case.

The West Virginia medical journal·2010
Same author

Hallux valgus, weak foot and the Keller operation: an end-result study.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2010
Same author

Usability of an adaptive computer assistant that improves self-care and health literacy of older adults.

Methods of information in medicine·2008
Same author

Feminism and public health ethics.

Journal of medical ethics·2006
Same author

Ethical issues in public health: a qualitative study of public health practice in Scotland.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2004

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Risk Communication
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Effective warnings are crucial for public safety.
  • The warning process involves distinct stages: notice, encode, comprehend, and comply.
  • Numerous factors influence warning effectiveness, categorized as person or warning variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an integrative perspective on empirical evidence regarding variables influencing the warning process.
  • To provide a resource for warning developers and guide warning analysis.
  • To identify research gaps and future directions in warning science.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of warning research.
  • Classification of influencing variables into person variables and warning variables.
  • Development of an integrative framework for understanding the warning process.

Main Results:

  • Identified key principles governing the influence of person and warning variables on the warning process.
  • Highlighted areas within the warning process requiring further investigation.
  • Outlined potential intervention methods and a research agenda.

Conclusions:

  • An integrated understanding of warning variables enhances warning design and effectiveness.
  • Future research should focus on poorly understood aspects of the warning process.
  • This framework supports improved warning development and analysis for practical applications.

Related Experiment Videos