Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laboratories and disease surveillance.

M R Skeels1

  • 1Oregon State Public Health Laboratory, Portland 97207-0275, USA.

Military Medicine
|August 2, 2000
PubMed
Summary

The U.S. system for tracking diseases relies on labs that test and report infections. Clinical labs handle most testing and send samples to public health labs for confirmation. Public health labs also identify disease clusters and provide training. However, changes in healthcare are reducing the number of samples available for analysis. Relationships between labs have also changed. This threatens the ability to monitor diseases effectively. A national system for public health testing is needed to maintain disease control.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a national laboratory system for public health.

Emerging infectious diseases·2001
Same author

Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone level and perchlorate in drinking water.

Teratology·2000
Same author

Neonatal thyroxine level and perchlorate in drinking water.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2000
Same author

Follow-up of newborns with low thyroxine and nonelevated thyroid-stimulating hormone-screening concentrations: results of the 20-year experience in the Northwest Regional Newborn Screening Program.

The Journal of pediatrics·1998
Same author

A large community outbreak of salmonellosis caused by intentional contamination of restaurant salad bars.

JAMA·1997
Same author

The Oregon Health Plan and public health.

Journal of health & social policy·1993

Area of Science:

  • Public health surveillance systems
  • Clinical laboratory diagnostics
  • Infectious disease epidemiology

Background:

Current disease tracking in the U.S. relies heavily on lab testing and reporting. Clinical labs handle most initial disease reports and send samples to public health labs for confirmation. Public health labs perform specialized tests to identify disease clusters and sources. They also offer unique diagnostic services and train other labs. However, changes in healthcare are affecting lab operations. Fewer isolates are available for analysis, and relationships between labs have shifted. This threatens the ability to monitor diseases effectively. Maintaining a strong lab network is essential for disease control. A national testing system is proposed to address these challenges.

Purpose Of The Study:

This analysis aims to highlight threats to disease surveillance from healthcare changes. It examines how lab testing and reporting support disease monitoring. The focus is on the role of clinical and public health labs in tracking infections. The study identifies declining isolate availability and shifting lab relationships. It emphasizes the need for a coordinated testing network. The goal is to preserve the infrastructure for disease control. The authors assess the current state of lab-based surveillance. They propose solutions to maintain surveillance effectiveness.

Keywords:
disease surveillance systemspublic health lab testingclinical lab reportinghealthcare infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

Public health labs perform special reference testing, identify disease clusters, and provide training for clinical labs.

Changes in healthcare delivery have reduced the number of isolates sent to public health labs for analysis.

Clinical labs report most diseases and refer samples to public health labs for confirmation and typing.

Lower testing volumes in public health labs may reduce the ability to detect and respond to disease outbreaks.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors review the structure of the U.S. disease surveillance system. They analyze the roles of clinical and public health laboratories. Data on testing volumes and sample referrals are examined. Changes in healthcare delivery and lab operations are considered. The study evaluates the impact of reduced isolate availability. It assesses the effects of shifting lab relationships. The authors compare historical and current lab practices. They propose a national system for public health testing.

Main Results:

Clinical labs report most diseases and refer samples to public health labs. Public health labs perform specialized typing and confirmation. They also provide training and quality assurance for clinical labs. However, fewer isolates are available for analysis in recent years. Public health lab testing volumes have declined. Relationships between clinical and public health labs have changed. These changes threaten surveillance effectiveness. A national testing system is needed to maintain disease control.

Conclusions:

The U.S. disease surveillance system depends on clinical and public health labs. Declining isolate availability and shifting lab relationships pose risks. Public health labs provide essential typing and confirmation services. They also train clinical labs and handle unique diagnostic requests. A national testing system is necessary to sustain surveillance. Maintaining lab networks is critical for disease control. The authors emphasize the importance of coordinated testing efforts. They highlight the need for infrastructure to support public health goals.

The authors suggest establishing a national system for public health testing to sustain surveillance infrastructure.

A complementary network of clinical and public health labs ensures accurate disease tracking and timely responses to outbreaks.