Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cesarean section for all twins?

I Blickstein1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel. blick@netvision.net.il

Journal of Perinatal Medicine
|August 3, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maternal intrapartum antibiotic treatment continues to exert a bactericidal effect on the umbilical cord and peripheral venous blood of newborn infants.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2017
Same author

Perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies following first-trimester bleeding.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2014
Same author

Does assisted reproduction technology, per se, increase the risk of preterm birth?

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2007
Same author

Monochorionicity in perspective.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2006
Same author

Lower embryonic loss rates among twin gestations following assisted reproduction.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2005
Same author

Effect of birth order on neonatal morbidity and mortality among very low birthweight twins: a population based study.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2004
Same journal

Readability of patient educational materials on ultrasound: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Correlations between fetal left ventricular Tei index and different hemodynamic parameters during middle and late pregnancy at high altitudes.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
Same journal

The role of Coroners in perinatal death investigation in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
Same journal

The cytokine Prokineticin-1 in preterm labor with and without intra-amniotic inflammation.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Birth weight percentiles in infants with neonatal-onset prolonged neonatal hypoglycemia and persistent congenital hyperinsulinism.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
Same journal

Limits of viability: are we heading in right direction?

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Cesarean delivery (CS) for twin gestations is often based on subjective factors rather than clear evidence. Quantitative data suggests CS offers no advantage in most twin pregnancy cases.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Background:

  • Twin gestations are associated with increased maternal and fetal complications.
  • Twin pregnancies are often perceived as high-risk, influencing delivery decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the decision-making process for Cesarean delivery (CS) in twin gestations.
  • To evaluate the evidence supporting CS in twin pregnancies versus subjective clinical judgment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical decision-making factors for CS in twin pregnancies.
  • Analysis of quantitative data comparing outcomes for vaginal birth versus CS in twins.

Main Results:

  • CS decisions in twin pregnancies are frequently based on qualitative, unquantified variables.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantitative data indicates no clear advantage for CS in the majority of twin gestation cases.
  • Subtle, non-evidence-based reasons often influence the choice for CS.

    • Conclusions:

    • The decision for CS in twin pregnancies is often subjective and not strongly supported by quantitative evidence.
    • Clinical practice may not align with evidence-based indications for Cesarean delivery in twins.
    • Further research is needed to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines for delivery mode in twin gestations.