Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vibrating-traction method for mechanical joint distraction.

S Minagi1, M Sakiya, T Sato

  • 1Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Okayama University Dental School, Japan. minagi@dent.okayama-u.ac.jp

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
|August 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Vibrating traction significantly enhances temporomandibular joint distraction compared to static traction. A 3000 Hz vibration frequency yielded the greatest joint distraction, suggesting a more effective and less forceful treatment approach.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of the optimal site in the neck region for detecting swallowing sounds.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2016
Same author

New method of neck surface electromyography for the evaluation of tongue-lifting activity.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2016
Same author

Effect of visual biofeedback of posterior tongue movement on articulation rehabilitation in dysarthria patients.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2015
Same author

A novel automated detection system for swallowing sounds during eating and speech under everyday conditions.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Effect of nasal speaking valve on speech intelligibility under velopharyngeal incompetence: a questionnaire survey.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Effect of occlusal rehabilitation on spatial memory and hippocampal neurons after long-term loss of molars in rats.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2014

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthodontics
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Mechanical static traction is a common treatment for joint issues and fractures.
  • The efficacy of mechanical vibration in conjunction with traction for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has not been extensively studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of mechanical vibration on the mechanical traction of the temporomandibular joint.
  • To compare the effectiveness of vibrating traction versus static traction for TMJ distraction.

Main Methods:

  • Six human subjects underwent mechanical traction on the temporomandibular joint.
  • A vibrating-traction apparatus generated frequencies of 1000, 3000, or 4000 Hz, applied dynamically with a 2000 gf force for 5 minutes.
  • Static traction served as the control, with vertical condylar displacement measured using Eddy current displacement sensors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The 3000 Hz vibration frequency produced the maximum mean vertical condylar displacement (668±242 microm).
  • Vibrations at 1000 Hz and 4000 Hz showed lesser traction effects.
  • Static traction resulted in minimal displacement (5.7±4.9 microm), indicating a negligible traction effect.

Conclusions:

  • Vibrating traction is significantly more effective in distracting the temporomandibular joint than static traction.
  • Effective vibrating traction may require less force compared to static traction for similar distraction outcomes.