Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-effectiveness analysis and screening tests for women.

L B Russell1

  • 1Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Journal of the American Medical Women'S Association (1972)
|August 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Cost-effectiveness analysis guides medical resource allocation. Optimizing screening test protocols, considering factors like accuracy and target population, maximizes health benefits for women.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and rationale of penn medicine healthy heart, a randomized trial of effectiveness of a centrally organized approach to blood pressure and cholesterol improvement among patients at elevated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

American heart journal·2024
Same author

Radiation-induced genetic damage in mice.

Progress in nuclear energy. Series 6 Biological sciences·2014
Same author

An allelic series of mutations in the kit ligand gene of mice. I. Identification of point mutations in seven ethylnitrosourea-induced Kitl(Steel) alleles.

Genetics·2002
Same author

An allelic series of mutations in the Kit ligand gene of mice. II. Effects of ethylnitrosourea-induced Kitl point mutations on survival and peripheral blood cells of Kitl(Steel) mice.

Genetics·2002
Same author

The methodologic partnership of effectiveness reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

American journal of preventive medicine·2001
Same author

Sequence interpretation. Functional annotation of mouse genome sequences.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2001

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Preventive medicine
  • Medical decision-making

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is crucial for identifying optimal medical interventions.
  • Screening tests are a key area for CEA, influencing healthcare resource allocation.
  • The efficacy of screening depends heavily on its implementation and context.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the cost-effectiveness of various medical screening tests.
  • To emphasize factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of screening interventions.
  • To highlight the importance of judicious screening protocol development for women's health.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) principles applied to screening tests.
  • Examination of key factors: test frequency, accuracy, condition risk, adverse effects.
  • Inclusion of costs: screening, follow-up, and treatment.
  • Consideration of the target population for screening.

Main Results:

  • The cost per year of life saved varies significantly based on screening test application.
  • Screening protocols must be carefully designed to optimize resource utilization.
  • Examples include screening for cervical and breast cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and thyroid failure in women.

Conclusions:

  • Wise development of screening protocols is essential for maximizing health benefits.
  • Cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on how a screening test is utilized.
  • Optimizing screening strategies ensures better use of medical resources and improved patient outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos