Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Bridging the gap between moral reasoning and adolescent engagement in risky behavior
T L Kuther1, A Higgins-D'Alessandro
1Department of Psychology, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT 06810, USA. kuthert@wcsu.edu
Abstract:
Relations among moral reasoning, domain judgment and engagement in risky behaviors were assessed with 68 students attending a Just Community school and 122 comparison students from the larger high school with which the alternative school is affiliated. Risky behaviors were perceived as personal decisions, rather than as ones of morality or convention. Engagement and domain judgment of risky behavior interacted; with increasing substance involvement, students were more likely to view the decision to use drugs and alcohol as a personal decision than as either a moral or conventional decision. Domain judgments of risks appeared to moderate the relation between moral reasoning and engagement in risky behavior, suggesting that moral education interventions must encourage youth to explore their views that much of their behavior is only their own business.
Related Concept Videos
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other