Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Human Auditory Fast and Slow Omitted Stimulus Potentials and Steady-State Responses.

Karamürsel1, Bullock

  • 1Department of Physiology, Istanbul Medical Faculty and Electro-Neuro-Physiology Research and Application Center, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

The International Journal of Neuroscience
|August 12, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational Simulation of Redox Reactions within a Metal Electrospray Emitter.

Analytical chemistry·2011
Same author

Author's reply

Ophthalmology·2000
Same author

Modeling assessment of transport and deposition patterns of anthropogenic mercury air emissions in the United States and Canada

The Science of the total environment·2000
Same author

Microscopic view of a two-dimensional lattice-Gas ising system within the grand canonical ensemble

Physical review letters·2000
Same author

A river network based hydrological model for predicting natural and influenced flow statistics at ungauged sites: Micro LOW FLOWS

The Science of the total environment·2000
Same author

Current awareness

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·2000
Same journal

Thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for patients undergoing minimally invasive vertebroplasty: effects on pain and lumbar function.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Recurrence associated IGFBP2 promotes malignant progression and epithelial mesenchymal transition in glioma cells via the AKT mTOR pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Decreased miR-1305 expression is associated with tumour invasiveness and poor prognosis in glioma patients.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Astaxanthin alleviates ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Clinical efficacy of cryopreserved autologous bone flaps versus titanium plates for cranioplasty: a retrospective comparative study.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Sericin improves diabetic cognitive impairment in rats by inhibiting TXNIP/NLRP3 neuroinflammation through SIRT1.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Researchers identified two distinct types of omitted stimulus potentials (OSPs) – fast and slow – in auditory and visual systems. These OSPs demonstrate precise timing, indicating predictive processing in the brain.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory and Visual Evoked Potentials
  • Brain Signal Processing

Background:

  • Omitted stimulus potentials (OSPs) are electrophysiological responses to the unexpected absence of a predicted stimulus.
  • Two types, fast and slow OSPs, have been previously described, primarily with visual stimuli.
  • The precise neural mechanisms and conditions influencing OSP generation remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the characteristics of fast and slow OSPs using auditory stimuli.
  • To compare the properties of fast and slow OSPs, including their dependence on stimulus rate, attention, and predictability.
  • To explore the relationship between OSPs and steady-state responses (SSRs).

Main Methods:

  • Auditory stimuli (clicks) were presented in trains at various frequencies (0.3-4 Hz for slow OSPs, 1-20+ Hz for fast OSPs).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Omissions of stimuli were introduced at predictable intervals.
  • Participant attention was manipulated, and stimulus regularity was varied.
  • Electrophysiological recordings captured brain responses, including OSPs and SSRs.

    • Main Results:

    • Fast OSPs were observed in response to auditory stimuli, similar to previous visual findings, occurring after stimulus omissions or train cessation.
    • Slow OSPs followed low-frequency click trains (0.3-4 Hz) and required participant attention, unlike fast OSPs.
    • Both OSP types exhibited constant peak latencies, suggesting accurate temporal prediction by the neural system.
    • Fast OSPs occurred even after multiple omissions and were unaffected by irregular inter-stimulus intervals, while slow OSPs were attenuated.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory fast OSPs share characteristics with visual fast OSPs, indicating a general neural mechanism for processing omitted stimuli.
    • The distinct properties of fast and slow OSPs highlight different neural pathways and processing demands (e.g., attention).
    • The findings support the role of precise temporal prediction in sensory processing and OSP generation.