Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structural symmetry and protein function.

D S Goodsell1, A J Olson

  • 1Department of Molecular Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. goodsell@scripps.edu, olson@scripps.edu

Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure
|August 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mesoscope: A Web-based Tool for Mesoscale Data Integration and Curation.

MolVa : Workshop on Molecular Graphics and Visual Analysis of Molecular Data 2020·2023
Same author

Cuttlefish: Color Mapping for Dynamic Multi-Scale Visualizations.

Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics·2019
Same author

Tomato bushy stunt virus at 2.9 A resolution.

Nature·2009
Same author

Analysis of large-scale sequencing of small RNAs.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2008
Same author

The molecular perspective: antibodies.

The oncologist·2001
Same author

Recognition templates for predicting adenylate-binding sites in proteins.

Journal of molecular biology·2001
Same journal

Regulation of actin filament assembly by Arp2/3 complex and formins.

Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure·2007
Same journal

Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression.

Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure·2007
Same journal

Physics of proteins.

Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure·2007
Same journal

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: novel variations of an established technique.

Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure·2007
Same journal

Structural mechanisms underlying posttranslational modification by ubiquitin-like proteins.

Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure·2007
Same journal

From "simple" DNA-protein interactions to the macromolecular machines of gene expression.

Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure·2007
See all related articles

Protein evolution favors symmetrical structures for stability and efficient assembly. While symmetry is common, various forms of asymmetry exist, driven by specific cellular functions and interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Most cellular proteins exist as symmetrical oligomeric complexes.
  • Oligomerization offers advantages in protein stability, function, and genetic efficiency.
  • Symmetry is a prevalent feature in protein complex evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the evolutionary drivers and diverse forms of symmetry in protein complexes.
  • To understand how functional, genetic, and physicochemical factors influence protein quaternary structure.
  • To investigate the prevalence and mechanisms of asymmetry in protein assemblies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of protein structures and evolutionary principles.
  • Review of literature on protein complex formation and symmetry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of various symmetry types and their functional implications.
  • Main Results:

    • Symmetrical oligomers are selected for morphological and cooperative functions, enhanced stability, and efficient synthesis.
    • Functional constraints like DNA/membrane interactions or directional motion can limit or break symmetry.
    • Various forms of asymmetry, including local, reciprocating, and global, are observed, with dimers often favored evolutionarily.

    Conclusions:

    • Protein complex evolution balances the benefits of symmetry with functional demands, leading to diverse structural solutions.
    • While symmetry offers advantages, evolutionary pressures can lead to various forms of asymmetry to meet specific cellular needs.
    • All crystallographic point groups are represented in protein structures, highlighting the adaptability of symmetry in evolution.