Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Galton's midparent height revisited.

T J Cole1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, London, UK. Tim.Cole@ich.ucl.ac.uk

Annals of Human Biology
|August 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved Centile Estimation by Transformation And/Or Adaptive Smoothing of the Explanatory Variable.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Gene-Specific Growth Charts for ASXL3 -Related Disorder.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2025
Same author

The LMS method should not be used to construct velocity centiles in puberty.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2024
Same author

Citation classic: distribution-free estimation of age-related centiles, by Healy, Rasbash and Yang (1988).

Annals of human biology·2024
Same author

Pubertal growth in height, sitting height and leg length in achondroplasia.

Annals of human biology·2021
Same author

Estimating peak height velocity in individuals.

Annals of human biology·2020
Same journal

Association between CHRNA5 polymorphisms and Parkinson's disease in Northern Chinese Han population: a case-control study.

Annals of human biology·2026
Same journal

Nanopore sequencing technology in forensic science: status quo and tendency.

Annals of human biology·2026
Same journal

Body composition phenotyping of obesity in children aged 6-18 years: multi-strategy clustering and interpretable machine learning.

Annals of human biology·2026
Same journal

Associations between growth, maturation and non-contact injury risk in Scottish male academy football: a prospective multi-academy study.

Annals of human biology·2026
Same journal

Observation of the therapeutic effect of flunarizine capsules combined with the Epley manoeuvre in the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Annals of human biology·2026
Same journal

Machine learning combined with WGCNA reveals potential calcium uptake-associated biomarkers in Parkinson's disease.

Annals of human biology·2026
See all related articles

This study compares two methods for calculating midparent height, finding that averaging parental height standard deviation scores (SDSs) is a valid alternative to Galton's original method. This approach also explains Galton's adjustment for sex differences in adult height.

Area of Science:

  • Anthropometry
  • Human Genetics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Sir Francis Galton introduced the concept of midparent height as the average of parental heights.
  • Galton used an adjustment factor (1.08) for daughters' heights to account for sex-based height differences.
  • An alternative method involves averaging parental heights after converting them to standard deviation scores (SDSs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Galton's conventional midparent height calculation with an alternative method using standard deviation scores (SDSs).
  • To investigate whether the SDS method explains Galton's imputation procedure for sex-based height discrepancies.
  • To validate the use of averaged parental height SDSs as a robust measure.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of two midparent height calculation methods: conventional averaging and averaging of parental height SDSs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of Galton's imputation procedure using a multiplier of 1.08 for daughters' heights.
  • Validation using height data from 17 national height references.

    • Main Results:

    • The procedure of multiplying daughters' heights by 1.08 is mathematically equivalent to averaging the height SDSs of sons and daughters.
    • Averaging the height SDSs of both parents provides a valid alternative to the conventional midparent height calculation.
    • The SDS method effectively accounts for sex-based differences in adult height.

    Conclusions:

    • Midparent height calculated using averaged parental height SDSs is a statistically sound and valid alternative to traditional methods.
    • The SDS approach offers a unified way to handle sex-based height variations in genetic studies.
    • This study validates and clarifies Galton's original imputation method through a modern statistical lens.