Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expertise and category-based induction.

J B Proffitt1, J D Coley, D L Medin

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60207-2710, USA. juliabeth@northwestern.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|August 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Frequency and coding responses in verbal discrimination learning.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Presentation order and recognition of categorically related examples.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Comparison and choice: Relations between similarity processes and decision processes.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Concepts and concept formation.

Annual review of psychology·2009
Same author

Asymmetries of comparison.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts.

Cognition·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Expert inductive reasoning relies on domain knowledge, not just typicality. Tree experts used causal-ecological factors and local coverage, challenging standard category-based induction models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Expertise Studies
  • Plant Pathology

Background:

  • Inductive reasoning is crucial for expert decision-making.
  • Current models often focus on typicality and diversity effects.
  • Expertise may influence reasoning strategies beyond these standard effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate inductive reasoning strategies in domain experts.
  • To examine how tree experts (landscapers, taxonomists, parks personnel) reason about novel diseases.
  • To compare expert reasoning with established models of category-based induction.

Main Methods:

  • Three reasoning tasks were administered to tree experts.
  • Tasks involved inferring disease impact on tree diversity and generating lists of affected trees.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reasoning justifications were collected and analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Typicality and diversity effects were minimal among experts.
    • Expert reasoning was primarily driven by 'local' coverage (intrafamilial spread) and causal-ecological factors.
    • Domain-specific knowledge significantly shaped inductive strategies.

    Conclusions:

    • Expert inductive reasoning is more complex than current models suggest.
    • Domain knowledge enables the use of diverse, context-specific reasoning strategies.
    • Future models should incorporate causal and ecological knowledge in category-based induction.