Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do clinical practice guidelines reflect research evidence?

I Savoie1, A Kazanjian, K Bassett

  • 1British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assessment, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
|August 18, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training prostate cancer survivors and caregivers to be peer navigators: a blended online/in-person competency-based training program.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2020
Same author

A core competency framework for prostate cancer peer navigation.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2019
Same author

Survivorship care plans for breast cancer patients: understanding the quality of the available evidence.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2017
Same author

Current Status of Companion and Complementary Diagnostics: Strategic Considerations for Development and Launch.

Clinical and translational science·2017
Same author

Survivorship care plans for people with colorectal cancer: do they reflect the research evidence?

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2016
Same author

Testing the effects of an empowerment-based leadership development programme: part 1 - leader outcomes.

Journal of nursing management·2013
Same journal

Patient reported outcomes of home diagnostics with colon capsule endoscopy - results from the 5G-SUCCEEDS study.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
Same journal

Cost-effectiveness of synchronous telehealth versus face-to-face care for asthma management: A systematic review.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
Same journal

Facilitators and barriers to implementing new models of care for patients in a rehabilitation care setting: A systematic review.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
Same journal

Rapid adaptation of first contact physiotherapy services for musculoskeletal patients in the UK and Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple case study.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
Same journal

Moving toward integrated care for perinatal opioid use disorder and mental health in an urban safety-net hospital: A formative implementation evaluation.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
Same journal

Beyond mitigation: Adaptation, policy and resilience for health services facing climate change.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
See all related articles

Clinical practice guidelines for cholesterol testing often fail to align with research evidence, potentially hindering cost control and quality of care improvements. Changes to guideline development are needed to ensure recommendations are evidence-based.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Guidelines
  • Health Economics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to improve healthcare quality and efficiency.
  • Cholesterol testing guidelines are crucial for cardiovascular disease management.
  • The alignment of CPGs with research evidence is critical for their effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if current cholesterol testing CPGs are based on research evidence.
  • To determine if these CPGs can effectively manage healthcare costs and quality.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search for cholesterol testing CPGs.
  • Independent critical appraisal of identified CPGs using a standardized checklist.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Four out of five analyzed CPGs lacked a clear link between research evidence and recommendations.
  • Greater involvement of clinical experts in CPG development correlated with weaker adherence to research evidence.
  • Clinical expert panels struggled to ensure recommendations were solely research-based.

Conclusions:

  • Existing cholesterol testing CPGs are unlikely to improve care quality or control costs.
  • The issue lies within the guideline development process, not implementation.
  • Revising the guideline development process and the role of clinical experts is necessary to ensure evidence-based recommendations.