Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preinduction cervical assessment.

R K Edwards1, D S Richards

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0294, USA.

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
|August 19, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Highly Atherogenic Lipid Particles are Associated with Preeclampsia After Successful Fertility Treatment for Obese Women who have Unexplained Infertility.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2023
Same author

Angular Analysis of the B^{+}→K^{*+}μ^{+}μ^{-} Decay.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Observation of a New Excited D_{s}^{+} Meson in B^{0}→D^{-}D^{+}K^{+}π^{-} Decays.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Observation of Multiplicity Dependent Prompt χ_{c1}(3872) and ψ(2S) Production in pp Collisions.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Model-Independent Study of Structure in B^{+}→D^{+}D^{-}K^{+} Decays.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Observation of Enhanced Double Parton Scattering in Proton-Lead Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=8.16  TeV.

Physical review letters·2020
Same journal

Obstetric Care for Patients With Cognitive Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Dissecting the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Requirements when Approaching Obstetric Patients With Disabilities: How to Ensure Your Spaces are Accessible for All.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Clinician Comfort and Barriers to the Obstetric and Gynecologic Care of Patients With Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Obstetric Care for Patients With Visual Impairments: Preconception Counseling Through Postpartum Care.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Menstrual Management and Contraception for Patients With Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Favoring Elective Hospitalization in Pregnancies With Vasa Previa.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

The Bishop score effectively predicts labor induction success and duration by assessing cervical dilation, effacement, consistency, and position. While criticized for not emphasizing dilation enough, it remains the most cost-effective method for cervical assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Clinical Assessment Tools

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of labor duration and induction success is crucial for patient safety and effective obstetric management.
  • Early cervical assessment methods relied on dichotomous classifications, limiting predictive accuracy.
  • The need for a comprehensive scoring system to evaluate cervical ripeness has long been recognized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the Bishop score in predicting labor induction outcomes.
  • To compare the Bishop score with newer methods like ultrasound for cervical assessment.
  • To determine the most cost-effective and reliable method for assessing cervical readiness for labor induction.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing literature on cervical scoring systems, focusing on the Bishop score.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of factors included in the Bishop score: cervical dilation, effacement, consistency, position, and presenting part station.
  • Comparison of the predictive validity of the Bishop score against modifications and alternative methods, including ultrasound.

    • Main Results:

    • The Bishop score, incorporating multiple cervical characteristics, is widely validated for predicting labor induction success and duration.
    • Cervical dilation shows the strongest association with successful labor outcomes within the Bishop score framework.
    • Despite criticisms, modifications to the Bishop score have not demonstrably improved predictability; ultrasound lacks convincing evidence of superior predictive value over digital examination.

    Conclusions:

    • The Bishop score remains the optimal, cost-effective method for assessing cervical ripeness and predicting labor induction success.
    • Current evidence does not support ultrasound as a superior alternative to the Bishop score for predicting labor induction outcomes.
    • Continued reliance on the Bishop score is recommended for its established validity and economic efficiency in clinical practice.