Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

07:34
FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Maternal serum screening for trisomy 18: assessing different statistical models to optimize detection rates
D M Kennedy1, V M Edwards, D J Worthington
1Department of Clinical Chemistry, Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK. david.kennedy@bham-womens.thenhs.com
Prenatal Diagnosis
|August 22, 2000
Summary
This study evaluated trisomy 18 screening models using maternal serum markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). The univariate analysis model demonstrated a higher detection rate for trisomy 18 screening.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal screening
- Maternal serum marker analysis
- Chromosomal abnormality detection
Background:
- Trisomy 18 screening is crucial for prenatal diagnosis.
- Maternal serum markers like AFP and hCG are used in screening protocols.
- Evaluating different analytical models can optimize screening accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate three alternative models for trisomy 18 screening.
- To compare the performance of bivariate and univariate analyses using AFP and hCG.
- To assess the impact of using population-specific versus published distribution parameters.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 46 affected and 48,150 unaffected pregnancies.
- Calculated AFP and hCG multiples of the median (MoMs) and their product.
- Compared detection and false positive rates for different models and parameter sets.
Main Results:
- A fixed cut-off for AFP and hCG yielded a 28.3% detection rate at 0.5% FPR.
- The univariate model showed a higher detection rate (32.6%) at 0.5% FPR using published parameters.
- Locally derived parameters improved the bivariate model's detection rate at higher FPRs but not lower ones.
Conclusions:
- Trisomy 18 screening using AFP and hCG is a valuable addition to Down syndrome screening.
- The univariate analysis model appears slightly more effective for trisomy 18 screening.
- The choice of distribution parameters can influence screening performance, particularly for the bivariate model.

