Related Experiment Videos
The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work
S S Luthar1, D Cicchetti, B Becker
1Department of Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027-6696, USA. Suniya.Luthar@columbia.edu
Child Development
|August 23, 2000
Summary
This study critically appraises resilience, defining it as positive adaptation despite adversity. It addresses criticisms regarding definition, heterogeneity, and stability, offering solutions to enhance understanding of at-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Resilience research has grown significantly.
- Criticisms include definitional ambiguity, heterogeneity of outcomes, and construct instability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise the construct of resilience.
- To address and resolve criticisms regarding resilience research.
- To clarify misunderstandings and highlight the potential of resilience research.
Main Methods:
- Critical appraisal of existing resilience literature.
- Analysis of common criticisms leveled against resilience research.
- Proposal of solutions for conceptual and methodological issues.
Main Results:
- Identified key criticisms: definitional ambiguity, heterogeneity, instability, and utility concerns.
- Proposed solutions for valid criticisms and clarified misunderstandings.
- Affirmed the substantial potential of resilience research for understanding at-risk populations.
Conclusions:
- Resilience research holds significant promise for understanding individuals facing adversity.
- Continued scientific attention to conceptual and methodological challenges is crucial for realizing resilience's full potential.