Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Examining interaction in language therapy.

S Horton1, S Byng

  • 1Department of Language and Communication Science, City University, London, UK. horton@ccscity.u-net.com

International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
|August 30, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: ROBIN: Reference observatory of basins for international hydrological climate change detection.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

ROBIN: Reference observatory of basins for international hydrological climate change detection.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Developmental activities of elite junior hockey players: an analysis of early sport specialization.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2023
Same author

Extracorporeal membrane modality conversions.

Perfusion·2014
Same author

Erythematous nodule on the nail bed.

Archives of dermatology·2014
Same author

A comparison study of haemolysis production in three contemporary centrifugal pumps.

Perfusion·2014
Same journal

'What Do You Mean by That? What Should I Do? What Should We Practice at Home?' Parental Perspectives on Multilingual Communication and Collaboration in Speech and Language Therapy.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Clinical Supervision in Speech-Language Pathology Undergraduate Programs: Development and Validation of a Graduate Survey.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same journal

A Systematic Review on Patient and Public Involvement in Research on Childhood Communication Difficulties.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Early Identification of DLD in Paediatric Practice: A Pilot Validation of the CLAP Screening Tool in Italian Outpatient Settings.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same journal

Immediate Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Stuttering: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published 2000-2024.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same journal

A Quasi-Experimental Study of an Online Communication Partner Training Program for Orthoptic Students.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
See all related articles

Precise interaction analysis is crucial for understanding how language therapy for aphasia is delivered. This study introduces a system to analyze therapist-patient interactions, aiming to improve therapy effectiveness and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neurolinguistics
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Discussions on a 'theory of therapy' necessitate clearer definitions of therapy components for aphasia.
  • The enactment of language therapy, particularly therapist-patient interaction, requires more precise specification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a system for analyzing interaction in language impairment therapy for aphasia.
  • To discuss the applications and methodological challenges of comparing therapy enactment.

Main Methods:

  • Development and description of a system for analyzing therapist-patient interaction in aphasia therapy.
  • Presentation of a sample analysis using the developed system.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study outlines a system for analyzing interaction dynamics in aphasia therapy.
  • Methodological difficulties in comparing therapy enactment are highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • More precise definitions of interactions are needed to understand therapy delivery in aphasia.
  • Understanding interaction is essential for evaluating the impact of therapy enactment on outcomes.