Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.

C B Pascal1

  • 1Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA. cpascal@osophs.dhhs.gov

Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.)
|August 30, 2000
PubMed
Summary

The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) defines scientific misconduct and oversees its response in Public Health Service (PHS)-funded research. ORI promotes research integrity through education and training, complementing institutional efforts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.

Professional ethics (Gainesville, Fla.)·2003
Same author

Misconduct annotations.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
Same author

Misconduct annotations.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
Same author

Intravenous drug abuse and AIDS transmission: Federal and State laws regulating needle availability.

NIDA research monograph·1988
Same author

Selected legal issues about AIDS for drug abuse treatment programs.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·1987
Same author

Improper release of patient from hospital.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·1982

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Research Ethics
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Scientific misconduct poses a significant threat to the integrity of research.
  • Robust oversight mechanisms are essential for maintaining public trust in science.
  • The Public Health Service (PHS) plays a crucial role in funding and regulating research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the responsibilities of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) in addressing scientific misconduct.
  • To outline the standards for responding to allegations of misconduct in PHS-funded research.
  • To explore the complementary roles of ORI and research institutions in promoting research integrity.

Main Methods:

  • Review of ORI's functions in defining and overseeing scientific misconduct.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of ORI's methods for recommending administrative actions.
  • Examination of institutional responsibilities in misconduct investigations and integrity promotion.
  • Consideration of the impact of legal precedent on research integrity standards.

    • Main Results:

    • ORI defines scientific misconduct, oversees institutional investigations, and recommends PHS administrative actions.
    • ORI actively promotes research integrity via education and training initiatives.
    • Research institutions have a primary role in daily research integrity management.
    • Legal precedents from civil litigation inform the determination of research integrity breaches.

    Conclusions:

    • ORI is central to defining and managing scientific misconduct in PHS-funded research.
    • A collaborative approach between ORI and research institutions is vital for upholding research integrity.
    • Continuous education and adherence to established standards are key to preventing and addressing misconduct.