Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Our decision on a cochlear implant.

E Peters1

  • 1Office of Canonical Affairs, Catholic Diocese of San Diego, CA, USA.

American Annals of the Deaf
|August 31, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hearing parents explain their decision against cochlear implantation for their profoundly deaf child. The essay explores their perspectives on deafness, Deaf culture, and the potential impact on their daughter, prioritizing informed choice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The victimisation experience schedule: contextualising interpersonal trauma and perceived discrimination in individuals with psychotic experiences with and without a need-for-care.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2025
Same author

Non-integer tangential singular beams in the near field: Collinear phase-shifting holography for topological charge determination.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Challenges of Case Management of COVID-19 in University of Uyo Teaching Hospital: A One-Year Experience.

West African journal of medicine·2022
Same author

2021 Canadian Surgery Forum: Virtual, online Sept. 21-24, 2021.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Etiology and Clinical Evaluation of Patients with Bronchiectasis in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.

West African journal of medicine·2022
Same author

Edemas of the face and lymphoscintigraphic examination.

Scientific reports·2021
Same journal

Breaking the Cycle: How Core Self-Evaluation Shapes Cyber-Relationship Addiction.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Eye Tracking Shows Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children with Cochlear Implants Read Like Hearing Peers.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Interpreting in Higher Education: American Sign Language-English Interpreters' Experience of the Structural and Cultural Environment within a University.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Itinerant Teachers' Writing Instruction.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Integrating Worlds: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study on the Influence of Deaf Role Models as Expressed by Hearing Parents.

American annals of the deaf·2026
Same journal

Language and Pretend Actions Understanding in Children with Hearing Loss.

American annals of the deaf·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Audiology
  • Cultural Anthropology

Background:

  • Parental decision-making regarding cochlear implants for deaf children is complex.
  • Understanding parental biases and perspectives is crucial in these ethical debates.
  • Deaf culture and identity are significant considerations in audiological choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To articulate the rationale behind the decision not to pursue cochlear implantation for a profoundly deaf child.
  • To openly share parental perspectives, including potential biases, in the context of a controversial medical intervention.
  • To contribute to the discourse on cochlear implant decisions by examining the child's well-being and cultural identity.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative essay presenting a personal narrative and ethical considerations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the authors' views on deafness and Deaf culture.
  • Discussion of the potential effects of cochlear implantation on the child's development and identity.

    • Main Results:

    • The authors present a reasoned argument against cochlear implantation based on their values and understanding of Deaf culture.
    • They identify and discuss perceived weaknesses in arguments favoring implants.
    • The decision-making process is framed as a balance between medical intervention and cultural identity.

    Conclusions:

    • The essay advocates for a nuanced approach to cochlear implant decisions, respecting diverse perspectives on deafness.
    • It emphasizes the importance of considering cultural identity alongside medical outcomes.
    • The authors conclude by reflecting on the personal and ethical dimensions of this significant parental choice.