[Liver resection for liver metastases--1998 Bern Symposium]

The increasing knowledge of the anatomy and function of the liver made the surgical resection of liver metastases currently to the therapy of choice. Although liver metastasis is an advanced stage in tumor-progression, surgery achieves the best long-term results due to a better understanding of the carcinogenesis (i.e. micrometastases) and the prognostic risk factors. This study summarizes the results of 109 resections of colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases during a period of 59 months at our department. Four different surgical techniques (extended hepatectomy vs. segmental resection vs. atypical resection vs. biopsy) were investigated. For resections a tumour-free resection margin of at least 10 mm was always attempted to achieve. The accumulated morbidity of all techniques together was 23%. Although the morbidity was higher for extended resections (Encephalopathy 16% vs. 2.3% for segmental resections, Liver insufficiency 23% vs. 4.7%), compared to the limited resection procedures, the long-term survival improved. The overall mortality was 2.7%. Survival was higher in patients with resection of colorectal than non colorectal metastases. Our results indicate that liver resection, under observance of the anatomical and functional margins (i.e. an adequate resection margin), is the only potentially curative therapy for liver metastases. An extensive formal resection, although inducing a higher perioperative morbidity, is superior to the limited resection techniques and results in an increased long-term survival. One reason is the increased probability of co-resection of preoperatively undetected local micrometastases.