Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interaction between positional but not between non-positional cues in human predictive learning.

Dibbets1, Maes, Vossen

  • 1Department of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Behavioural Processes
|September 2, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prey catching in the archer fish: does the fish use a learned correction for refraction?

Behavioural processes·2000
Same author

Training history affects magnitude of spontaneous recovery from extinction of appetitive conditioned responding.

Behavioural processes·2000
Same author

Systematic intensity errors and model imperfection as the consequence of spectral truncation

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2000
Same author

Effects of pregnancy and delivery on serum concentrations of Clara Cell Protein (CC16), an endogenous anticytokine: lower serum CC16 is related to postpartum depression

Psychiatry research·1999
Same author

Plant tagnology.

Trends in plant science·1999
Same author

The Effect of a Discrete Signal on Context Conditioning: Assessment by Preference and Freezing Tests

Learning and motivation·1996
Same journal

Shining a light on jellyfish behaviour: Enhanced motor activity and positive phototaxis in Aurelia coerulea.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Detour-task performance in color polymorphic male mosquitofish.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Behavioral and physiological changes during the estrous cycle of socially housed female guinea pigs.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Flexible time-series analysis: A dynamically aware method for inferring directed dependencies in behavioral data.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Effects of group size and landmarks on escape behavior of three fish species.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Vocal individuality in two sympatric seabird species: The role of developmental strategy, analytical approach and sample size.

Behavioural processes·2026
See all related articles

Positional cues enhance cue-interaction effects in predictive learning tasks. This suggests spatial information significantly influences how humans learn associations between cues and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning and Memory

Background:

  • Understanding cue-interaction effects is crucial for explaining complex associative learning.
  • Previous research has explored various factors influencing cue competition and interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of positional cues in modulating cue-interaction effects within a predictive learning paradigm.
  • To determine if spatial arrangement influences the perceived contingency of compound cues.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments utilized a computer-controlled predictive learning task with human subjects.
  • Subjects learned associations between cues (P+, N-) and outcomes, then experienced compound cues (PR+, NI+).
  • Contingency ratings were collected, with variations in cue modality (verbal vs. geometric) and spatial position (fixed vs. variable).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence for cue interaction, where cue I was rated higher than cue R, was observed only when cue positions were fixed.
  • Variable cue positions did not yield significant cue-interaction effects.
  • Verbal and geometric cues showed similar patterns when spatial position was controlled.

Conclusions:

  • The spatial arrangement of cues significantly facilitates cue-interaction effects in predictive learning.
  • Positional information appears to play a critical role in resolving ambiguity and modulating associative strength.
  • Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms of this spatial facilitation.