Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 13, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
06:13

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Published on: February 5, 2021

Economic impact of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high-risk coronary patients

J T Christenson1, F Simonet, M Schmuziger

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin-Geneva, Switzerland. jtchristenson@hotmail.com

Insights

Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy significantly reduces costs for high-risk coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This therapy offers substantial savings, making it a cost-beneficial option for these patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy is known to be effective in high-risk coronary patients.
  • The economic implications of using IABP in this patient group require detailed investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive cost analysis of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high-risk coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations.
  • To compare the total hospital costs between patients receiving IABP and a control group.

Main Methods:

  • Pooled data from two randomized studies and 144 consecutive low-risk CABG operations were analyzed.
  • Detailed cost analysis was performed using hospital finance department data.
  • Costs for high-risk CABG patients with and without preoperative IABP were compared to a control group.

Main Results:

  • High-risk CABG without IABP cost 65,892 Swiss francs, while with IABP, it cost 41,948 Swiss francs.
  • Low-risk CABG operations cost 35,335 Swiss francs.
  • The use of IABP in high-risk patients resulted in a significant cost reduction (p = 0.0015).

Conclusions:

  • Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy is a significantly cost-beneficial intervention for high-risk coronary patients undergoing CABG.
  • This therapy leads to an average saving of 24,000 Swiss francs per patient, representing a 36% reduction in total hospital costs.
Abstract