Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[On physiological costs of working processes].

V V Rozenblat

    Meditsina Truda I Promyshlennaia Ekologiia
    |September 7, 2000
    PubMed
    Summary

    Current methods for assessing work process hardiness and intensity need improvement. A new formula offers integral evaluation considering all ergonomic and hygienic factors, using a leading factor adjusted to deciles and centiles.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [The 210th anniversary of the publication of the first Russian textbook on human physiology].

    Fiziologiia cheloveka·1998
    Same author

    [Human factor and occupational standardization].

    Meditsina truda i promyshlennaia ekologiia·1994
    Same author

    [Fatigue during dynamic and static muscle activity in man].

    Fiziologiia cheloveka·1989
    Same author

    [Distortions of respiratory indices during muscle work in research procedures using masks].

    Biulleten' eksperimental'noi biologii i meditsiny·1985
    Same author

    [2 types of adaptation of human cardiorespiratory indices to physical loading].

    Fiziologiia cheloveka·1985
    Same author

    [Is an integral evaluation of fatigue possible?].

    Gigiena i sanitariia·1984

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health
    • Ergonomics
    • Work Physiology

    Background:

    • Current methods for evaluating work process hardiness and intensity are insufficient.
    • There is a need for a more comprehensive approach to work assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop an improved method for integral evaluation of the work process.
    • To incorporate ergometric and hygienic factors into a unified assessment framework.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a novel formula for integral work process evaluation.
    • Utilizing a leading factor adjusted to decile and centile ranks.
    • Consideration of all relevant ergometric and hygienic parameters.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed formula enables an integral evaluation of work process hardiness and intensity.
    • The method accounts for a wide range of occupational factors.
    • The leading factor adjustment provides a standardized metric.

    Conclusions:

    • The authors' formula offers a significant improvement for assessing work process characteristics.
    • This approach provides a more accurate and holistic understanding of occupational demands.
    • The method facilitates better workplace design and health management.

    Related Experiment Videos