Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Deciding on radical prostatectomy: the physician's perspective.

E A El-Gabry1, S E Strup, L G Gomella

  • 1Department of Urology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

Seminars in Urologic Oncology
|September 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Urine Extracellular Vesicle GATA2 mRNA Discriminates Biopsy Result in Men with Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Efficacy of post-operative radiation in a prostatectomy cohort adjusted for clinical and genomic risk.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Targeting cell cycle and hormone receptor pathways in cancer.

Oncogene·2013
Same author

Costs of early adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: a decision analysis.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2011
Same author

Analyzing the FHIT Gene by RT-PCR, Western Blotting, and Immunohistochemistry.

Methods in molecular medicine·2011
Same journal

The role of adjunctive postchemotherapy surgery for nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors: current concepts and controversies.

Seminars in urologic oncology·2002
Same journal

Poor prognosis germ-cell tumors: An unresolved challenge.

Seminars in urologic oncology·2002
Same journal

Chemotherapy for good-risk germ-cell tumors.

Seminars in urologic oncology·2002
Same journal

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors.

Seminars in urologic oncology·2002
Same journal

Contralateral testicular biopsy procedure in patients with unilateral testis cancer: is it indicated?

Seminars in urologic oncology·2002
Same journal

Controversies in the management of testicular seminoma.

Seminars in urologic oncology·2002
See all related articles

Choosing the best localized prostate cancer treatment involves weighing surgery against other options like radiation or observation. This article details radical prostatectomy, discussing its indications, surgical approaches, and outcomes compared to conservative management.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Localized prostate cancer treatment selection is complex.
  • Multiple factors influence treatment decisions, including patient age, health, cancer stage, and personal preferences.
  • Patients and physicians have access to extensive data on various treatment modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review radical prostatectomy as a primary treatment for localized prostate cancer from a urologist's perspective.
  • To discuss indications, surgical approaches (retropubic vs. perineal), and outcomes of radical prostatectomy.
  • To compare radical prostatectomy with conservative management and radiation therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of indications for radical prostatectomy.
  • Discussion of retropubic and perineal surgical approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of reported morbidity and mortality associated with radical prostatectomy.
  • Comparative analysis with non-surgical treatment options.

    • Main Results:

    • Radical prostatectomy is a viable primary treatment for localized prostate cancer.
    • Surgical approach (retropubic vs. perineal) has implications for outcomes.
    • Morbidity and mortality data are crucial for patient counseling.
    • Comparison with radiation and conservative management provides context for surgical decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Radical prostatectomy is a key surgical option for localized prostate cancer.
    • Understanding surgical nuances and comparative effectiveness is vital for optimal patient care.
    • Informed decision-making requires comprehensive data on all treatment modalities.