Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 10, 2012
Assessing quality in decision analytic cost-effectiveness models. A suggested framework and example of application
M Sculpher1, E Fenwick, K Claxton
1Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England.
This paper proposes a quality assessment framework for decision analytic models used in cost-effectiveness analysis. It ensures optimal treatment decisions are made under uncertainty, enhancing healthcare resource allocation.
Area of Science:
- Health economics and decision science.
- Methodological research in evidence-based healthcare.
Background:
- Decision analytic modelling is increasingly used in cost-effectiveness analysis.
- A lack of literature exists on best practices for decision analysis quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define 'validity' and 'quality' in decision analysis.
- To propose a framework for assessing the quality of cost-effectiveness models.
- To guide analysts and reviewers in evaluating decision models.
Main Methods:
- Reviewing the purpose and scientific characteristics of cost-effectiveness models.
- Developing a taxonomy of quality dimensions: model structure, data, and consistency.
- Suggesting a non-exhaustive list of quality assessment questions.
Main Results:
- Rejection of strict scientific codification for decision models.
- Emphasis on falsifiability and current evidence for scientific validity.
- A proposed framework for assessing model quality based on structure, data, and consistency.
Conclusions:
- A quality assessment framework is necessary and achievable for decision models.
- The framework encourages explicit justification of methods by analysts.
- It enables informed judgments on model relevance, coherence, and usefulness for decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

