Usefulness of imputation for the analysis of incomplete otoneurologic data

The usefulness of imputation in the treatment of missing values of an otoneurologic database for the discriminant analysis was evaluated on the basis of the agreement of imputed values and the analysis results. The data consisted of six patient groups with vertigo (N=564). There were 38 variables and 11% of the data was missing. Missing values were filled in with the means, regression and Expectation-Maximisation (EM) imputation methods and a random imputation method provided the baseline results. Means, regression and EM methods agreed on 41-42% of the imputed missing values. The level of agreement between these and the random method was 20-22%. Despite the moderate agreement between the means, regression and EM methods, the discriminant functions were similar and accurate (prediction accuracy 83-99%). The discriminant functions obtained from the randomly imputed data were also accurate having prediction accuracy 88-97%. Imputation seems to be a useful method for treating the missing data in this database. However, a lot of data was missing in otoneurologic tests, which are likely to be of less importance in the diagnosis of vertiginous patients. Consequently, the disagreement of the methods did not affect clearly the discriminant analysis, and, therefore, future research requires more complete data and advanced imputation methods.