Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving value measurement in cost-effectiveness analysis.

P A Ubel1, E Nord, M Gold

  • 1Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

Medical Care
|September 12, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Evaluation of Economic Methods to Assess the Social Value of Medical Interventions for Ultra-Rare Disorders (URDS).

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

Severity of illness versus expected benefit in societal evaluation of healthcare interventions.

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2009
Same author

Campylobacter immunity and coinfection following a large outbreak in a farming community.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2008
Same author

Commentary on drug-eluting stents: NICE technology appraisal guidance.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2008
Same author

Fracture healing in HIV-positive populations.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2008
Same author

Perspectives of Alzheimer's disease treatments.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2008

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) needs to incorporate societal values to guide healthcare decisions. Moving beyond quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) can help escape the "QALY trap" and better reflect fairness preferences.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Public health policy
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a tool for healthcare allocation.
  • Current CEA methods, using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), may not fully capture societal values.
  • Societal preferences for fairness and equity are not adequately incorporated into traditional CEA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify limitations in current cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) methods.
  • To explore how societal values can be better integrated into CEA.
  • To propose an alternative approach to CEA that moves beyond the limitations of QALYs.

Main Methods:

  • Declarative exposition of theoretical fallacies in CEA.
  • Discussion of societal values not currently incorporated into CEA, such as prioritizing severely ill patients and avoiding discrimination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the
  • QALY trap
  • and its implications for individuals with disabilities or chronic illnesses.

    • Main Results:

    • Traditional CEA, relying on QALYs, can lead to counterintuitive conclusions, such as undervaluing treatments for conditions like paraplegia.
    • Current QALY-based methods may fail to recognize the benefit of curing conditions that do not extend life expectancy but improve quality of life.
    • Societal values regarding fairness and equity are not accurately reflected in QALY measurements.

    Conclusions:

    • Amending CEA methodology to incorporate a wider range of societal values is necessary.
    • Basing cost-effectiveness measurements on societal values, rather than solely on QALYs, can better capture public preferences for rationing.
    • This approach can help escape the
    • QALY trap
    • and lead to more equitable healthcare allocation decisions.