Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn't tell us.

L I Solberg1

  • 1HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis 55440-1524, USA. Leif.I.Solberg@HealthPartners.com

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|September 13, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Clinical guideline implementation studies often overlook systems thinking and organizational change. Focusing on individual clinician behavior, they neglect crucial practice system and environmental factors for improving medical care quality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The failure of a controlled trial to improve depression care: a qualitative study.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2002
Same author

A CQI intervention to change the care of depression: a controlled study.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same author

Aids to quitting tobacco use: how important are they outside controlled trials?

Preventive medicine·2001
Same author

Variation in clinical preventive services.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2001
Same author

STEP(ing)-UP to deliver clinical preventive services.

American journal of preventive medicine·2001
Same author

Failure of a continuous quality improvement intervention to increase the delivery of preventive services. A randomized trial.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2001

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Medical practice management
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Numerous studies and reviews exist on clinical guideline implementation.
  • Effectiveness of clinical guidelines in improving medical care quality remains uncertain.
  • This study investigates the recognition of systems thinking and organizational change in guideline implementation literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess whether existing literature acknowledges the importance of systems thinking for guideline implementation.
  • To determine if organizational change is recognized as a key factor in successful guideline adoption.
  • To evaluate the focus of systematic reviews on factors influencing guideline implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a literature search for systematic reviews on guideline implementation and practice improvement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed each systematic review for its discussion of systems changes, organizational support, and practice environment.
  • Evaluated the extent to which a change process was considered in the reviewed studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Forty-seven high-quality systematic reviews were identified.
    • Reviews highlighted reminders and feedback during clinical encounters as effective implementation strategies.
    • These reviews seldom identified strategies as systems changes and rarely discussed organizational support or environmental factors.

    Conclusions:

    • Guideline implementation reviews predominantly focus on individual clinician behavior change.
    • There is a lack of attention to practice systems, organizational support, and environmental context.
    • Future research should incorporate systems thinking and organizational change to enhance understanding of medical care improvement.