Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting parameters in the logistic regression model with random effects.

K Larsen1, J H Petersen, E Budtz-Jørgensen

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. k.larsen@biostat.ku.dk

Biometrics
|September 14, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence of scabies in Ouvea, New Caledonia: A population-based survey.

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2026
Same author

CD138 expression in the endometrium associates with endometrial timing and inflammatory status but not microbiota composition.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Associations between mental illness, TB risk and migrant status.

IJTLD open·2024
Same author

Birth Cohort Studies of Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution in Early Life and Development of Asthma in Children and Adolescents from Denmark.

Research report (Health Effects Institute)·2024
Same author

2021 Canadian Surgery Forum: Virtual, online Sept. 21-24, 2021.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Testicular cancer survivors have shorter anogenital distance that is not increased by 1 year of testosterone replacement therapy.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2021

Logistic regression with random effects models nonindependent outcomes. We propose the median odds ratio for interpreting random effects, enhancing communication between data analysts and researchers.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Logistic regression with random effects is crucial for analyzing binary outcomes with nonindependent data.
  • Interpreting random effects parameters as heterogeneity measures can be challenging for researchers.
  • Clear interpretation of model parameters is vital for effective data analysis and subject-matter communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a detailed examination of the interpretation of fixed and random effects parameters in logistic regression models with random effects.
  • To address the interpretability challenges associated with random effects parameters used as heterogeneity measures.
  • To propose and illustrate an alternative measure for heterogeneity that facilitates easier interpretation.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized logistic regression with random effects to model binary outcomes in nonindependent datasets.
  • Analyzed the interpretation of both fixed and random effects parameters within these models.
  • Introduced and evaluated the median odds ratio as an alternative measure of heterogeneity.

Main Results:

  • Standard random effects parameters present difficulties in direct interpretation as heterogeneity measures.
  • The median odds ratio offers a more intuitive interpretation, framed in terms of familiar odds ratios.
  • This measure simplifies communication regarding model heterogeneity between analysts and researchers.

Conclusions:

  • The median odds ratio provides a valuable and interpretable measure for heterogeneity in logistic regression with random effects.
  • Adopting the median odds ratio can significantly improve the clarity and utility of statistical models in applied research.
  • The proposed measure enhances the collaborative process between statisticians and domain experts through accessible interpretation.