Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Control of error in randomized clinical trials.

M J Keirse1, M Hanssens

  • 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. marc.keirse@flinders.edu.au

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|September 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Randomized clinical trials are crucial for healthcare comparisons but prone to errors. This review highlights systematic and chance errors, emphasizing bias and publication bias to improve trial validity and systematic reviews.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Guideline on Pelvic Floor Disorders: consensus on Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS).

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2026
Same author

Corrigendum: Cemiplimab for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients.

Frontiers in nephrology·2025
Same author

Cemiplimab for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients.

Frontiers in nephrology·2023
Same author

The Belgian Obstetric Surveillance System to monitor severe maternal morbidity.

Facts, views & vision in ObGyn·2018
Same author

Nationwide population-based cohort study of uterine rupture in Belgium: results from the Belgian Obstetric Surveillance System.

BMJ open·2016
Same author

Gestational diabetes: overview of the new consensus screening strategy and diagnostic criteria.

Acta clinica Belgica·2012

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for comparing healthcare interventions.
  • Errors in RCTs can significantly impact patient care and research conclusions.
  • Systematic reviews rely heavily on the quality of included RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce major sources of errors in randomized clinical trials.
  • To discuss methods for minimizing both systematic and random errors.
  • To highlight the impact of small trials and publication bias on systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common sources of systematic errors in RCTs, including selection bias, outcome assessment bias, contamination, and co-intervention.
  • Discussion of random errors, such as Type I and Type II errors, and strategies for their reduction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the challenges posed by small clinical trials and publication bias.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key systematic biases: biased entry/exclusion, outcome assessment bias, contamination, and co-intervention.
    • Explained random errors (Type I and Type II) and methods for minimization.
    • Highlighted publication bias as a significant issue, especially concerning small trials in systematic reviews.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness and mitigation of systematic and random errors are essential for valid RCTs.
    • Careful consideration of trial size and publication bias is critical for reliable systematic reviews.
    • Improving RCT methodology enhances the quality of evidence-based healthcare decisions.