Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Risk analysis in surgery. A method of increasing effectiveness and efficiency: a neglected method].

H Troidl1

  • 1Chirurgische Klinik Köln-Merheim.

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift Fur Alle Gebiete Der Operativen Medizen
|September 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Risk analysis in surgery is crucial for treatment choices and quality assessment but currently has limitations for individual patient prediction. While valuable for group analysis and comparing surgical quality, its effectiveness for individual risk remains uncertain.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The impact of preoperative classification of expected intraoperative difficulties. A multicenter study].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2014
Same author

Feasibility hazards.

Surgical endoscopy·2004
Same author

[Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and intestinal integrity in endotoxinemia: CO2 versus helium].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same author

[Revitalizing donor livers after cardiovascular arrest with venous oxygen persufflation].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same author

[Organization of pain therapy in surgery--comparison of acute pain service and alternative concepts].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2003
Same author

[Psoas abscesses. Genesis, diagnosis, and therapy].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2003

Area of Science:

  • Surgical oncology
  • Clinical research methodology
  • Medical statistics

Background:

  • Risk estimation is fundamental for selecting surgical therapies and evaluating surgical care quality.
  • Current understanding of surgical risk often narrowly focuses on morbidity and mortality, neglecting therapy failure or intention perversion.
  • Accurate risk assessment is complex, requiring consideration of numerous variables beyond simple complication enumeration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define a structured, stepwise approach for determining surgical risk factors.
  • To explore the utility and limitations of risk analysis in surgical decision-making and quality assessment.
  • To investigate the potential benefits of risk analysis for both group and individual patient outcomes in surgery.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A proposed seven-step process for risk factor determination, starting with clarifying circumstances and progressing to hypothesis development and probability assessment.
  • Utilizing mathematical models, clinical experiments, and surgeon experience to quantify risk.
  • Ranking risk factors by significance and evaluating their impact on surgical intervention decisions.

Main Results:

  • Risk analysis is advantageous for group analyses and essential for comparing surgical quality across clinics.
  • Current risk analysis methods have significant limitations in predicting surgical therapy risk for individual patients, offering only approximately 70% certainty.
  • The surgeon is recognized as a risk factor, but within a complex system, their influence is one among many.

Conclusions:

  • Risk analysis requires further proof of effectiveness, as current methods are time-consuming and primarily successful for group assessments.
  • While indispensable for comparing surgical quality between institutions, risk analysis is currently inadequate for individual patient risk prediction.
  • Risk analysis is an integral aspect of clinical research that warrants further development and consideration, particularly for enhancing individual patient care.