Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reconstruction of cranial defects.

R C Shaw, H R Thering

    Clinics in Plastic Surgery
    |October 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explores reconstruction methods for cranial defects. Methyl methacrylate, autogenous bone grafts, and silicone implants offer effective alternatives to metallic implants, providing radiolucent and EEG-compatible results.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Essential hypertension; an examination of its mechanism in relation to surgical treatment.

    American journal of surgery·2010
    Same author

    Remarks on THE CAUSATION OF ANGINA PECTORIS.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    THE CERVICAL SYMPATHETIC AND ITS RELATION TO THE THYROID GLAND IN EXOPHTHALMIC GOITRE.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Experimental support for the role of nest predation in the evolution of brood parasitism.

    Journal of evolutionary biology·2009
    Same author

    A case for unique allied health student enrollment control within a selective university setting.

    Journal of allied health·1996
    Same author

    Embryo transplants: ethical stance needed.

    The Veterinary record·1988

    Area of Science:

    • Neurosurgery
    • Plastic Surgery
    • Biomaterials

    Background:

    • Cranial defects present reconstructive challenges.
    • Metallic implants have limitations, including cold intolerance and interference with diagnostic imaging.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate alternative materials and techniques for cranial defect reconstruction.
    • To compare the advantages of non-metallic implants over traditional metallic options.

    Main Methods:

    • Reconstruction of small defects using methyl methacrylate.
    • Utilizing autogenous split rib bone grafts for larger defects, particularly in pediatric and active adult patients.
    • Employing preformed, sculptable silicone implants for contour correction and depressed bone defects, especially in the supraorbital and forehead regions.

    Main Results:

    • Methyl methacrylate provides easy reconstruction for small defects.
    • Autogenous bone grafts are effective for larger defects in specific patient populations.
    • Silicone implants offer versatile contour correction and defect filling capabilities.
    • All three methods avoid the cold intolerance associated with metallic implants.
    • The discussed methods result in radiolucent reconstructions that do not interfere with electroencephalogram (EEG) examinations.

    Conclusions:

    • Methyl methacrylate, autogenous bone grafts, and silicone implants are superior alternatives to metallic implants for cranial reconstruction.
    • These non-metallic options offer improved patient comfort and diagnostic compatibility.
    • The choice of method depends on defect size, patient factors, and available resources.

    Related Experiment Videos